Intimate Partner Violence Among Service Members and Veterans: Differences by Sex and Rurality

Overview

Journal Traumatology (Tallahass Fla)

Date 2024 May 31

PMID 38818342

Authors

David L Albright

Justin McDaniel

Kelli Godfrey

Catherine Carlson

Kari L Fletcher

Kate Hendricks Thomas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Among military service members and veterans (SMVs), factors unique to military service may contribute to an elevated risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization. Although rurality has been established as a risk factor for IPV, differences in IPV victimization by rural- urban dwelling location, SMV status, and sex have not been explored. The purpose of this study was to estimate the rate of IPV victimization in rural and urban areas in the United States by SMV status and sex. We obtained Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (BRFSS; = 18,755); fit a mixed-effects, multilevel generalized linear model to the data for IPV victimization; and linked the model to U.S. Census Bureau population count data. We generated predicted estimates of IPV for SMVs and civilians separately by sex in rural and urban areas. The direct IPV victimization prevalence rate for the entire BRFSS sample was 16.90%. Substantial variation in model-based IPV prevalence was observed across subgroups. Female SMVs (rural = 23.54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [17.33, 30.02]; urban = 23.34%, 95% CI [17.48, 30.17]) had higher IPV victimization rates than female civilians (rural = 14.55%, 95% CI [13.06, 16.37]; urban = 14.50%, 95% CI [13.19, 16.34]), whereas male civilians (rural = 8.06%, 95% CI [7.19, 9.08]; urban = 8.02%, 95% CI [7.27, 9.02]) had higher IPV victimization rates than male SMVs (rural = 7.21%, 95% CI [6.03, 8.47]; urban = 7.17%, 95% CI [6.00, 8.41]). Programming for preventing and assisting in recovering from IPV exposure should target rural-dwelling female SMVs.

Citing Articles

Exploring Veteran Mental Health Disparities: A Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Communities in the Midwest of the United States.

Manietta L, McLaughlin S, MacArthur M, Landmann J, Kumbalatara C, Love M J Community Health. 2024; 50(1):172-177.

PMID: 39367238 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01408-8.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies.

Cowlishaw S, Freijah I, Kartal D, Sbisa A, Mulligan A, Notarianni M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886702 PMC: 9316917. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148853.

The experience of health and welfare workers in identifying and responding to domestic abuse among military personnel in the UK.

Sparrow K, Alves-Costa F, Alves A, Greenberg N, Howard L, Fear N BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):947.

PMID: 33059688 PMC: 7559780. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05672-x.

References

Miller E, Jordan B, Levenson R, Silverman J . Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010; 81(6):457-9. PMC: 2872678. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.023. View

Capaldi D, Knoble N, Wu Shortt J, Kim H . A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence. Partner Abuse. 2012; 3(2):231-280. PMC: 3384540. DOI: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231. View

Li Q, Kirby R, Sigler R, Hwang S, LaGory M, Goldenberg R . A multilevel analysis of individual, household, and neighborhood correlates of intimate partner violence among low-income pregnant women in Jefferson county, Alabama. Am J Public Health. 2009; 100(3):531-9. PMC: 2820063. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151159. View

Taft C, Weatherill R, Woodward H, Pinto L, Watkins L, Miller M . Intimate partner and general aggression perpetration among combat veterans presenting to a posttraumatic stress disorder clinic. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010; 79(4):461-8. PMC: 3561901. DOI: 10.1037/a0016657. View

McDaniel J, Klesges R . State-specific cigarette use rates among service members and veterans, United States, 2017. Tob Prev Cessat. 2020; 5:28. PMC: 7205057. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/111536. View

Edwards K . Intimate Partner Violence and the Rural-Urban-Suburban Divide: Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of the Literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014; 16(3):359-73. DOI: 10.1177/1524838014557289. View

Eshelman L, Levendosky A . Dating violence: mental health consequences based on type of abuse. Violence Vict. 2012; 27(2):215-28. DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.2.215. View

Taft C, Kachadourian L, Suvak M, Pinto L, Miller M, Knight J . Examining impelling and disinhibiting factors for intimate partner violence in veterans. J Fam Psychol. 2012; 26(2):285-9. PMC: 3547363. DOI: 10.1037/a0027424. View

Cronholm P, Fogarty C, Ambuel B, Harrison S . Intimate partner violence. Am Fam Physician. 2011; 83(10):1165-72. View

10.

Breiding M, Black M, Ryan G . Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(2):112-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.001. View

11.

Bernstein E, Bernstein J, Feldman J, Fernandez W, Hagan M, Mitchell P . An evidence based alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) curriculum for emergency department (ED) providers improves skills and utilization. Subst Abus. 2007; 28(4):79-92. PMC: 3976968. DOI: 10.1300/J465v28n04_01. View

12.

Dudgeon A, Evanson T . Intimate partner violence in rural U.S. areas: what every nurse should know. Am J Nurs. 2014; 114(5):26-35. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000446771.02202.35. View

13.

Gibbs A, Jewkes R, Willan S, Washington L . Associations between poverty, mental health and substance use, gender power, and intimate partner violence amongst young (18-30) women and men in urban informal settlements in South Africa: A cross-sectional study and structural equation model. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204956. PMC: 6169941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204956. View

14.

Davidov D, Davis S, Zhu M, Afifi T, Kimber M, Goldstein A . Intimate partner violence-related hospitalizations in Appalachia and the non-Appalachian United States. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184222. PMC: 5590902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184222. View

15.

Redmond S, Wilcox S, Campbell S, Kim A, Finney K, Barr K . A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work. 2014; 50(1):9-20. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-141987. View

16.

Teten A, Sherman M, Han X . Violence between therapy-seeking veterans and their partners: prevalence and characteristics of nonviolent, mutually violent, and one-sided violent couples. J Interpers Violence. 2008; 24(1):111-27. DOI: 10.1177/0886260508315782. View

17.

McDaniel J, Thomas K, Angel C, Erwin M, Nemec L, Young B . Regional differences in BMI, obesity, and exercise frequency in a large veteran service organization: A secondary analysis of new veteran member surveys from Team Red, White & Blue. Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12:116-121. PMC: 6140822. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.001. View

18.

Peek-Asa C, Wallis A, Harland K, Beyer K, Dickey P, Saftlas A . Rural disparity in domestic violence prevalence and access to resources. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011; 20(11):1743-9. PMC: 3216064. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2891. View

19.

Gerber M, Iverson K, Dichter M, Klap R, Latta R . Women veterans and intimate partner violence: current state of knowledge and future directions. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014; 23(4):302-9. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4513. View