Science and Sex: A Bold Agenda for Women's Health
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Mitchell S, Madrigal-Matute J, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Fang E, Aon M, Gonzalez-Reyes J
. Effects of Sex, Strain, and Energy Intake on Hallmarks of Aging in Mice. Cell Metab. 2016; 23(6):1093-1112.
PMC: 4911707.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.027.
View
2.
Woitowich N, Woodruff T
. Opinion: Research community needs to better appreciate the value of sex-based research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(15):7154-7156.
PMC: 6462069.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903586116.
View
3.
Murrar S, Johnson P, Lee Y, Carnes M
. Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30(9):1259-1267.
PMC: 8561742.
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8666.
View
4.
Waltz M, Saylor K, Fisher J, Walker R
. Biomedical Researchers' Perceptions of the NIH's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy for Animal Research: Results from a U.S. National Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30(10):1395-1405.
PMC: 8590154.
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8997.
View
5.
Woitowich N, Woodruff T
. Implementation of the NIH Sex-Inclusion Policy: Attitudes and Opinions of Study Section Members. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018; 28(1):9-16.
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7396.
View