» Articles » PMID: 38816857

Comparison of Resistance Training Using Barbell Half Squats and Trap Bar Deadlifts on Maximal Strength, Power Performance, and Lean Mass in Recreationally Active Females: an Eight-week Randomised Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 May 30
PMID 38816857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of high load resistance training using barbell half squats compared with trap bar deadlifts on maximal strength, power performance, and lean mass in recreationally active females.

Methods: Twenty-two recreationally active female participants (age: 26.9 ± 7.7 yrs.; height: 166.0 ± 5.1 cm; weight: 68.6 ± 9.9 kg) were randomly assigned to either a barbell half squat group (SG: n = 10) or trap bar deadlift group (DG: n = 12). Training consisted of twice-weekly sessions for eight weeks. Both groups completed one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing for both barbell half squat and trap bar deadlift groups. Countermovement jump (CMJ) and sprint performance were also assessed. Total body (TBLM) and leg lean mass (LLM) were measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Between-group differences were analysed using analysis of covariance.

Results: SG tended to improve 1RM half squat (21.0 ± 11.5 kg vs. 13.1 ± 7.5 kg) more than DG (mean difference (MD): 8.0 kg, 95% CI: -0.36 - 16.3 kg). A similar pattern in favour of DG (18.4 ± 11.2 vs. 11.7 ± 8.1 kg) compared to SG was observed (MD: 6.5 kg, 95% CI: -2.5 - 15.6 kg). No between-group differences for sprint, jump or lean body mass changes was observed. For groups combined, the following changes in CMJ (2.0 ± 2.4 cm), 5-m sprint (-0.020 ± 0.039 s), 15-m sprint (-0.055 ± 0.230 s), TBLM (0.84 ± 1.12 kg), and LLM (0.27 ± 0.59 kg) was observed.

Conclusions: An exercise intervention consisting of half squats or trap bar deadlift were associated with improved muscle strength, power, and lean mass. Our findings suggests that in recreationally active females, exercise selection is less of a concern provided that heavy loads are applied, and relevant muscle groups are targeted.

References
1.
Hughes D, Ellefsen S, Baar K . Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017; 8(6). PMC: 5983157. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029769. View

2.
Camara K, Coburn J, Dunnick D, Brown L, Galpin A, Costa P . An Examination of Muscle Activation and Power Characteristics While Performing the Deadlift Exercise With Straight and Hexagonal Barbells. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(5):1183-8. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001352. View

3.
Rana S, Chleboun G, Gilders R, Hagerman F, Herman J, Hikida R . Comparison of early phase adaptations for traditional strength and endurance, and low velocity resistance training programs in college-aged women. J Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22(1):119-27. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f30e7. View

4.
Ovretveit K, Toien T . Maximal Strength Training Improves Strength Performance in Grapplers. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 32(12):3326-3332. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002863. View

5.
Midorikawa T, Ohta M, Torii S, Sakamoto S . Lean Soft Tissue Mass Measured Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Is an Effective Index for Assessing Change in Leg Skeletal Muscle Mass Following Exercise Training. J Clin Densitom. 2018; 21(3):394-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.03.008. View