» Articles » PMID: 38816010

Light Exposure Profiles Differ Between Myopes and Non-myopes Outside School Hours

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 May 30
PMID 38816010
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Considering the putative role of light in myopia, and variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, educational and environmental factors across ethnicities, we objectively investigated light exposure patterns in Indian school children.

Methods: The light exposure profile of 143 school children (9-15 years, 50 myopes) recorded using a validated wearable light tracker for six continuous days was analysed. Additional data for non-school days were available for 87 children (26 myopes). The illuminance exposure levels, time spent outdoors and epoch (number of times participant is exposed to a predefined range of lux level per day) were compared between myopes and non-myopes across different light conditions: ≥1000, ≥3000, ≥5000 and ≥10 000 lux. For school days, light exposure profiles during (1) before school, school and after school hours; and (2) class, break and transition (when a student travels to and from school) time were analysed.

Results: The overall median (IQR) daily illuminance exposure level, time spent outdoors and epochs at outdoors (≥1000 lux) were 807 (507-1079) lux/day, 46 (30-64) min/day and 9 (6-12) times/day, respectively. The daily illuminance exposure on non-school days was significantly higher in non-myopes than myopes (6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) lux/day, p=0.04). During transition time (school days), non-myopes had significantly higher illuminance exposure (910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) lux/day, p=0.04), spent more time outdoors (25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) min/day, p=0.01) and had higher outdoor epochs (6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) times/day, p=0.01) than myopes.

Conclusions: A small but significant difference in illuminance exposure, time spent outdoors and epoch was noted between myopes and non-myopes during transition time, which may have implications in myopia control.

References
1.
Lan W, Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F . Intermittent episodes of bright light suppress myopia in the chicken more than continuous bright light. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e110906. PMC: 4216005. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110906. View

2.
Foulds W, Barathi V, Luu C . Progressive myopia or hyperopia can be induced in chicks and reversed by manipulation of the chromaticity of ambient light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(13):8004-12. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12476. View

3.
Karthikeyan S, Ashwini D, Priyanka M, Nayak A, Biswas S . Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022; 70(3):728-739. PMC: 9114537. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1564_21. View

4.
Muralidharan A, Lanca C, Biswas S, Barathi V, Wan Yu Shermaine L, Seang-Mei S . Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2022; 13:25158414211059246. PMC: 8721425. DOI: 10.1177/25158414211059246. View

5.
Howell C, McCullough S, Doyle L, Murphy M, Saunders K . Reliability and validity of the Actiwatch and Clouclip for measuring illumination in real-world conditions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021; 41(5):1048-1059. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12860. View