Effectiveness of Action Observation Treatment Based on Pathological Model in Hemiplegic Children: a Randomized-controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Eur J Phys Rehabil Med

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 May 30

PMID 38814197

Authors

Antonino Errante

Laura Beccani

Jessica Verzelloni

Irene Maggi

Mariacristina Filippi

Barbara Bressi

Settimio Ziccarelli

Francesca Bozzetti

Stefania Costi

Adriano Ferrari

Leonardo Fogassi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Action observation treatment (AOT) is an innovative therapeutic approach consisting in the observation of actions followed by their subsequent repetition. The standard version of AOT consists in the observation/imitation of a typically developed individual, which is proposed as model (TDM-AOT).

Aim: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of AOT based on a pathological ameliorative model (PAM-AOT) versus TDM-AOT in improving upper limb ability in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP).

Design: The study consists in a prospective randomized controlled, evaluator-blinded trial (RCT), with two active arms, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of AOT based on pathological model (PAM-AOT) as compared to a standard AOT based on TDM (TDM-AOT).

Setting: The 3-week AOT program was administered in a clinical setting. For some patients, the treatment was delivered at participant's home with the remote support of the physiotherapist (tele-rehabilitation).

Population: Twenty-six children with UCP (mean age 10.5±3.09 years; 14 females) participated in the study, with the experimental group observing a pathological model and the control group observing a typically developed model.

Methods: Motor assessments included unimanual and bimanual ability measures conducted at T0 (baseline, before the treatment), T1 (3 weeks after T0), T2 (8-12 weeks after treatment) and T3 (24-28 weeks after treatment); a subset of 16 patients also underwent fMRI motor assessment. Generalized Estimating Equations models were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in bimanual function (GEE, Wald 106.16; P<0.001) at T1 (P<0.001), T2 (P<0.001), and T3 (P<0.001). Noteworthy, the experimental group showed greater improvement than the control group immediately after treatment (P<0.013). Both groups exhibited similar improvement in unimanual ability (GEE, Wald 25.49; P<0.001). The fMRI assessments revealed increased activation of ventral premotor cortex after treatment in the experimental compared with control group (GEE, Wald 6.26; P<0.012).

Conclusions: Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of PAM-AOT in achieving short-term improvement of upper limb ability in children with UCP.

Clinical Rehabilitation Impact: These findings have significant implications for rehabilitative interventions based on AOT in hemiplegic children, by proposing a non-traditional approach focused on the most functional improvement achievable by imitating a pathological model.

References

Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V . Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(9):661-70. DOI: 10.1038/35090060. View

Molinaro A, Micheletti S, Pagani F, Garofalo G, Galli J, Rossi A . Action Observation Treatment in a tele-rehabilitation setting: a pilot study in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 44(7):1107-1112. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1793009. View

Nystrom P . The infant mirror neuron system studied with high density EEG. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3(3-4):334-47. DOI: 10.1080/17470910701563665. View

House J, Gwathmey F, Fidler M . A dynamic approach to the thumb-in palm deformity in cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63(2):216-25. View

Beani E, Menici V, Sicola E, Ferrari A, Feys H, Klingels K . Effectiveness of the home-based training program Tele-UPCAT (Tele-monitored UPper Limb Children Action Observation Training) in unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023; 59(5):554-563. PMC: 10664769. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07945-5. View

Biagi L, Cioni G, Fogassi L, Guzzetta A, Sgandurra G, Tosetti M . Action observation network in childhood: a comparative fMRI study with adults. Dev Sci. 2015; 19(6):1075-1086. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12353. View

Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G . Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27(9):808-15. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313497101. View

Sgandurra G, Biagi L, Fogassi L, Ferrari A, Sicola E, Guzzetta A . Reorganization of action observation and sensory-motor networks after action observation therapy in children with congenital hemiplegia: A pilot study. Dev Neurobiol. 2020; 80(9-10):351-360. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22783. View

Nuara A, Avanzini P, Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M . Efficacy of a home-based platform for child-to-child interaction on hand motor function in unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019; 61(11):1314-1322. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14262. View

10.

Buccino G, Molinaro A, Ambrosi C, Arisi D, Mascaro L, Pinardi C . Action Observation Treatment Improves Upper Limb Motor Functions in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Combined Clinical and Brain Imaging Study. Neural Plast. 2018; 2018:4843985. PMC: 6079352. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4843985. View

11.

Friston K, Holmes A, Price C, Buchel C, Worsley K . Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage. 1999; 10(4):385-96. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0484. View

12.

Sgandurra G, Biagi L, Fogassi L, Sicola E, Ferrari A, Guzzetta A . Reorganization of the Action Observation Network and Sensory-Motor System in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: An fMRI Study. Neural Plast. 2018; 2018:6950547. PMC: 6083552. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6950547. View

13.

Gentilucci M, Fogassi L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Camarda R, Rizzolatti G . Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and the control of proximal movements. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(3):475-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00248741. View

14.

Randall M, Imms C, Carey L, Pallant J . Rasch analysis of The Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 56(7):665-72. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12391. View

15.

Calvo-Merino B, Grezes J, Glaser D, Passingham R, Haggard P . Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(19):1905-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065. View

16.

Doyon J, Benali H . Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(2):161-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004. View

17.

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J . Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):341-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004. View

18.

Caruana F, Gerbella M, Avanzini P, Gozzo F, Pelliccia V, Mai R . Motor and emotional behaviours elicited by electrical stimulation of the human cingulate cortex. Brain. 2018; 141(10):3035-3051. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy219. View

19.

Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 340:c332. PMC: 2844940. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c332. View

20.

Louwers A, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Boeschoten K, Beelen A . Reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017; 59(9):926-932. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13465. View