Delayed Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Affects Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life, Not Just Quality of Reduction

Overview

Journal Indian J Orthop

Publisher Springer Nature

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 May 30

PMID 38812864

Authors

Kantapon Dissaneewate

Thammaphong Khongkanin

Rahat Jarayabhand

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures remains a major problem in many parts of the world. No previous studies have reported the effect of fixation delay on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to investigate the effect of delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures on health-related quality of life, EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and other related outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 117 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for displaced acetabular fractures between 2014 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups based on the admission-to-surgery time (interval between injury and definitive surgery): 1-14, 15-21, and >21 days. Patients were analysed for associations between admission-to-surgery time and postoperative outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative complication, and quality of reduction. Eighty-five patients with a mean follow-up time of 3.94 ± 1.84 years were analysed for the association between admission-to-surgery time and conversion to total hip arthroplasty, the Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, EQ-5D score, ability to sit cross-legged, and ability to sit squat. Multivariable linear regression was used for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for categorical outcomes associated with delayed operative fixation.

Results: An admission-to-surgery time > 14 days was associated with significantly higher blood loss [785 mL (236-1335), = 0.006]. For associated fractures, an admission-to-surgery time > 21 days increased the risk of poor reduction [odds ratio (OR), 5.21 (1.42-19.11), = 0.013]. Further, admission-to-surgery time > 21 days was associated with poor Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scores [OR, 8.46 (1.48-48.29), = 0.016], EQ-5D pain domain [OR, 3.55 (1.15-11), = 0.028], and EQ-5D usual activity domain [OR, 4.24 (1.28-14), = 0.018].

Conclusion: Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures after 21 days affected the functional outcomes and HRQOL, independent of the reduction status. Surgical interventions and patient referrals should occur at the earliest and within 21 days from the time of injury.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01163-x.

References

Borg T, Berg P, Larsson S . Quality of life after operative fixation of displaced acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 26(8):445-50. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31824c07cb. View

Huda N, Islam M, Bishnoi S, Utsav K . Factors affecting the functional outcome of surgically managed displaced acetabular fractures. Int J Burns Trauma. 2021; 11(2):105-111. PMC: 8166661. View

Brueton R . A review of 40 acetabular fractures: the importance of early surgery. Injury. 1993; 24(3):171-4. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90285-e. View

Cahueque M, Martinez M, Cobar A, Bregni M . Early reduction of acetabular fractures decreases the risk of post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis?. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8(4):320-326. PMC: 5647687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.01.001. View

Ochs B, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T . Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: Analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury. 2010; 41(8):839-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.010. View

Janssen M, Bonsel G, Luo N . Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36(6):675-697. PMC: 5954015. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0623-8. View

Verbeek D, van der List J, Moloney G, Wellman D, Helfet D . Assessing Postoperative Reduction After Acetabular Fracture Surgery: A Standardized Digital Computed Tomography-Based Method. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(7):e284-e288. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001161. View

Hernefalk B, Eriksson N, Borg T, Larsson S . Estimating pre-traumatic quality of life in patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries: Does timing matter?. Injury. 2015; 47(2):389-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.006. View

Xiang H, Yang X, Huang Z, Xu W, Chen Y, Li T . Treatment of Delayed Acetabular Fractures by Periacetabular Osteotomy through the Lateral-Rectus Approach. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(12):3233-3241. PMC: 9732581. DOI: 10.1111/os.13509. View

10.

Kelly J, Ladurner A, Rickman M . Surgical management of acetabular fractures - A contemporary literature review. Injury. 2020; 51(10):2267-2277. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.016. View

11.

Giannoudis P, Nikolaou V, Kheir E, Mehta S, Stengel D, Roberts C . Factors determining quality of life and level of sporting activity after internal fixation of an isolated acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(10):1354-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22572. View

12.

Mears D, Velyvis J, Chang C . Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (407):173-86. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00026. View

13.

Gupta R, Singh H, Dev B, Kansay R, Gupta P, Garg S . Results of operative treatment of acetabular fractures from the Third World--how local factors affect the outcome. Int Orthop. 2007; 33(2):347-52. PMC: 2899060. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0461-3. View

14.

Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, Barlow N, Deo S, Worlock P . Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum. The time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(9):1197-203. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17588. View

15.

Boissonneault A, Schenker M, Wilson J, Schwartz A, Staley C, Maceroli M . Impact of Prolonged Skeletal Traction in Patients With Acetabular Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 34(2):77-81. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001653. View

16.

Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill A, Bircher M . Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years' follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(2):229-36. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24056. View

17.

Meesters A, Ten Duis K, Kraeima J, Banierink H, Stirler V, Wouters P . The accuracy of gap and step-off measurements in acetabular fracture treatment. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18294. PMC: 8440593. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97837-9. View

18.

Pattanaphesaj J, Thavorncharoensap M, Ramos-Goni J, Tongsiri S, Ingsrisawang L, Teerawattananon Y . The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018; 18(5):551-558. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574. View

19.

Johnson E, Matta J, Mast J, LETOURNEL E . Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21-120 days following injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (305):20-30. View

20.

Matta J, Anderson L, EPSTEIN H, Hendricks P . Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (205):230-40. View