Reduced Sensitivity to Future Consequences Underlies Gambling Decision in Cerebellar Ataxia

Overview

Journal J Neurol Sci

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Neurology

Date 2024 May 29

PMID 38810429

Authors

Ruo-Yah Lai

Eli Levy

Christian J Amlang

Ihika Rampalli

Rory Mahabir

Ming-Kai Pan

Chi-Ying R Lin

Sheng-Han Kuo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has identified that people with cerebellar ataxia (CA) showed impaired reward-related decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). To investigate the mechanisms underlying this impairment, we examined CA participants' combination of performance in the IGT, which predominantly tests reward seeking, and the modified IGT (mIGT), which mainly assesses punishment avoidance.

Methods: Fifty participants with CA and one hundred controls completed the IGT and mIGT. Task performance in each of the five twenty-trial blocks was compared between groups and the learning rates were assessed with simple linear regressions. Each participant's IGT score and mIGT score were compared.

Results: CA participants performed worse than controls in both the IGT and the mIGT, especially in the last block (IGT: -0.24 ± 10.05 vs. 3.88 ± 10.31, p = 0.041; mIGT: 2.72 ± 7.62 vs. 8.65 ± 8.64, p < 0.001). In contrast to the controls, those with CA did not significantly improve their scores over time in either task. Controls performed better in the mIGT than the IGT, while CA participants' scores in the two tasks showed no significant difference. IGT and mIGT performance did not correlate with ataxia severity or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion: Individuals with CA showed impaired performance in both the IGT and mIGT, which indicates disruption in both short-term reward seeking and short-term punishment avoidance. Therefore, these results suggest that reduced sensitivity to long-term consequences drives the risky decision-making in CA.

References

Miquel M, Nicola S, Gil-Miravet I, Guarque-Chabrera J, Sanchez-Hernandez A . A Working Hypothesis for the Role of the Cerebellum in Impulsivity and Compulsivity. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13:99. PMC: 6513968. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00099. View

Amokrane N, Viswanathan A, Freedman S, Yang C, Desai N, Pan M . Impulsivity in Cerebellar Ataxias: Testing the Cerebellar Reward Hypothesis in Humans. Mov Disord. 2020; 35(8):1491-1493. PMC: 7423596. DOI: 10.1002/mds.28121. View

Sendhilnathan N, Semework M, Goldberg M, Ipata A . Neural Correlates of Reinforcement Learning in Mid-lateral Cerebellum. Neuron. 2020; 106(1):188-198.e5. PMC: 8015782. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.032. View

Lo R, Figueroa K, Pulst S, Perlman S, Wilmot G, Gomez C . Depression and clinical progression in spinocerebellar ataxias. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015; 22:87-92. PMC: 4695274. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.021. View

Schmahmann J, Sherman J . The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998; 121 ( Pt 4):561-79. DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.4.561. View

Stoet G . PsyToolkit: a software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42(4):1096-104. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096. View

Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H . Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 11):2189-202. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2189. View

Schmahmann J . Emotional disorders and the cerebellum: Neurobiological substrates, neuropsychiatry, and therapeutic implications. Handb Clin Neurol. 2021; 183:109-154. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822290-4.00016-5. View

Amokrane N, Lin C, Desai N, Kuo S . The Impact of Compulsivity and Impulsivity in Cerebellar Ataxia: A Case Series. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2020; 10:43. PMC: 7583703. DOI: 10.5334/tohm.550. View

10.

Heffley W, Song E, Xu Z, Taylor B, Hughes M, McKinney A . Coordinated cerebellar climbing fiber activity signals learned sensorimotor predictions. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(10):1431-1441. PMC: 6362851. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0228-8. View

11.

Ohmae S, Medina J . Climbing fibers encode a temporal-difference prediction error during cerebellar learning in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(12):1798-803. PMC: 4754078. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4167. View

12.

Wagner M, Kim T, Savall J, Schnitzer M, Luo L . Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward. Nature. 2017; 544(7648):96-100. PMC: 5532014. DOI: 10.1038/nature21726. View

13.

Schmahmann J . Ferdinando Rossi Lecture: the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome-Implications and Future Directions. Cerebellum. 2022; 22(5):947-953. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01456-7. View

14.

Schmitz-Hubsch T, Tezenas Du Montcel S, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C . Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006; 66(11):1717-20. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92. View

15.

Tessier A, Cosin C, Mayo W, Pfeuty M, Misdrahi D, Sibon I . Impulsive aggressive obsessions following cerebellar strokes: a case study. J Neurol. 2015; 262(7):1775-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7804-6. View

16.

Chen T, Lin C, Aumann M, Yan Y, Amokrane N, Desai N . Impulsivity Trait Profiles in Patients With Cerebellar Ataxia and Parkinson Disease. Neurology. 2022; 99(2):e176-e186. PMC: 9280994. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200349. View

17.

Lai R, Desai N, Amlang C, Lin C, Chen T, Minyetty M . Gambling associated risk-taking decision in cerebellar ataxia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022; 107:105252. PMC: 9905314. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.105252. View