» Articles » PMID: 38809322

Dose-Response Effects of MittEcho, a Measurement Feedback System, in an Indicated Mental Health Intervention for Children in Municipal and School Services in Norway

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 May 29
PMID 38809322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Including routine client feedback can increase the effectiveness of mental health interventions for children, especially when implemented as intended. Rate of implementation, or dose, of such feedback interventions has been shown to moderate results in some studies. Variation in implementation and use of client feedback may also contribute to the mixed results observed within the feedback literature. This study evaluates dose-response associations of client feedback using a novel Measurement Feedback System (MFS) within an indicated group intervention. The primary aim was to determine whether the rate of MFS implementation predicts symptom reduction in anxiety and depression among school-aged children. The secondary aim was to assess whether the rate of MFS implementation influences children's satisfaction with the group intervention or their dropout rates. Data were collected via a randomized factorial study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558) across 58 primary schools in Norway. Children aged 8 to 12 years (N = 701) participated in a group-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression. Half of the child groups also received the feedback intervention using the MittEcho MFS. Group leaders (N = 83), recruited locally, facilitated the interventions. The MFS dose was measured using the Implementation Index, which combines the use of MFS by both children and providers (group leaders) into a single dose variable. Results showed no significant additional effect of dose of MFS on change in depression or anxiety scores, on user satisfaction with the intervention or on intervention dropout. The discussion addresses potential reasons for these non-significant findings and implications for MFS implementation in preventive, group-based interventions in school settings.

References
1.
Rognstad K, Wentzel-Larsen T, Neumer S, Kjobli J . A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Feedback Systems in Treatment for Common Mental Health Disorders. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022; 50(2):269-282. PMC: 9931854. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01236-9. View

2.
Conley C, Shapiro J, Kirsch A, Durlak J . A meta-analysis of indicated mental health prevention programs for at-risk higher education students. J Couns Psychol. 2017; 64(2):121-140. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000190. View

3.
Sichel C, Connors E . Measurement feedback system implementation in public youth mental health treatment services: a mixed methods analysis. Implement Sci Commun. 2022; 3(1):119. PMC: 9682849. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00356-5. View

4.
Bickman L, Kelley S, Breda C, de Andrade A, Riemer M . Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2011; 62(12):1423-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.002052011. View

5.
Gleacher A, Olin S, Nadeem E, Pollock M, Ringle V, Bickman L . Implementing a Measurement Feedback System in Community Mental Health Clinics: A Case Study of Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015; 43(3):426-40. PMC: 4560680. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0642-0. View