» Articles » PMID: 38809090

Impact of Pancreatic and Biliary Stent on Post-endoscopic Papillectomy Complications: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 29
PMID 38809090
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is recommended as the first-line therapy for ampullary tumors, despite a relatively high incidence of complications. Pancreatic and/or biliary stents are placed at the endoscopist's discretion to prevent post-EP complications. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different stents.

Methods: A total of 117 patients who underwent EP and met the criteria between June 2006 and October 2022 were enrolled in the study. These patients were divided into a pancreatic stent group (PS group, n = 47), a biliary stent group (BS group, n = 38), and a two-stent group (PBS [PS and BS] group, n = 32). Relevant clinical data were collected and compared among the three groups. Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to explore risk factors for post-EP complications.

Results: The incidence of all complications was 37.6% (44/117). Pancreatitis and hemorrhage were the two most common complications with incidence rates of 14.5% (17/117) and 17.9% (21/117). The incidence rates of post-EP pancreatitis were 10.6% (5/47), 23.7% (9/38), and 9.4% (3/32) in the PS group, BS group, and PBS group, respectively, with no significant differences. There were also no significant differences in other complications among the three groups. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.99; P = 0.022) was independently associated with post-EP pancreatitis while tumor size (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.06-2.60; P = 0.028) was independently associated with post-EP hemorrhage.

Conclusions: While pancreatic stenting is the first choice to prevent post-EP pancreatitis, biliary stenting could also be considered as a substitute for patients with difficulties in pancreatic cannulation. Two-stent (biliary and pancreatic stent) placement is unnecessary unless it is required due to other concerns.

References
1.
Jiang L, Chai N, Li M, Linghu E . Therapeutic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Complications of Endoscopic Papillectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021; 17:531-541. PMC: 8169047. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S309103. View

2.
Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M . Carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. A clinicopathologic study and pathologic staging of 109 cases of carcinoma and 5 cases of adenoma. Cancer. 1987; 59(3):506-15. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870201)59:3<506::aid-cncr2820590326>3.0.co;2-#. View

3.
Choi S, Lee H, Kim J, Choe J, Lee J, Hyun J . Clinical outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy of ampullary adenoma: A multi-center study. World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28(17):1845-1859. PMC: 9099193. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i17.1845. View

4.
Ismail S, Marianne U, Heikki J, Jorma H, Leena K . Endoscopic papillectomy, single-centre experience. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28(11):3234-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3596-5. View

5.
Tran T, Vitale G . Ampullary tumors: endoscopic versus operative management. Surg Innov. 2005; 11(4):255-63. DOI: 10.1177/155335060401100409. View