» Articles » PMID: 38806209

Hidden Systems in Primary Care Cancer Detection: an Embedded Qualitative Intervention Development Study

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 May 28
PMID 38806209
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: UK cancer mortality is worse than in many other high-income countries, partly because of diagnostic delays in primary care.

Aim: To understand beliefs and behaviours of GPs, and systems of general practice teams, to inform the Think Cancer! intervention development.

Design And Setting: An embedded qualitative study guided by behaviour change models (COM-B [Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour] and theoretical domains framework [TDF]) in primary care in Wales, UK.

Method: Twenty qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs were undertaken and four face-to-face focus groups held with practice teams. Framework analysis was used and results were mapped to multiple, overlapping components of COM-B and TDF.

Results: Three themes illustrate complex, multilevel referral considerations facing GPs and practice teams; external influences and constraints; and the role of practice systems and culture. Tensions emerged between individual considerations of GPs (Capability and Motivation) and context-dependent external pressures (Opportunity). Detecting cancer was guided not only by external requirements, but also by motivational factors GPs described as part of their cancer diagnostics process. External influences on the diagnosis process often resulted from the primary-secondary care interface and social pressures. GPs adapted their behaviour to deal with this disconnect. Positive practice culture and supportive practice-based systems ameliorated these tensions and complexity.

Conclusion: By exploring individual GP behaviours together with practice systems and culture we contribute new understanding about how cancer diagnosis operates in primary care and how delays can be improved. We highlight commonly overlooked dynamics and tensions that are experienced by GPs as a tension between individual decision making (Capability and Motivation) and external considerations, such as pressures in secondary care (Opportunity).

References
1.
Khan N, Jones D, Grice A, Alderson S, Bradley S, Carder P . A brave new world: the new normal for general practice after the COVID-19 pandemic. BJGP Open. 2020; 4(3). PMC: 7465568. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101103. View

2.
Weller D, Peake M, Field J . Presentation of lung cancer in primary care. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019; 29(1):21. PMC: 6531460. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-019-0133-y. View

3.
Disbeschl S, Surgey A, Roberts J, Hendry A, Lewis R, Goulden N . Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021; 7(1):100. PMC: 8059131. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y. View

4.
Evans J, Ziebland S, I MacArtney J, Bankhead C, Rose P, Nicholson B . GPs' understanding and practice of safety netting for potential cancer presentations: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018; 68(672):e505-e511. PMC: 6014413. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X696233. View

5.
Neal R, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din N, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J . Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112 Suppl 1:S92-107. PMC: 4385982. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.48. View