» Articles » PMID: 38803961

Evaluation of Liver Regeneration After Hemi-hepatectomy by Combining Computed Tomography and Post-operative Liver Function

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 May 28
PMID 38803961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate evaluation of postoperative liver regeneration is essential to prevent postoperative liver failure.

Aims: To analyze the predictors that affect liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy.

Method: Patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy in Hangzhou First People's Hospital and Hangzhou Shulan Hospital from January 2016 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The regeneration index (RI) was calculated by the following equation: RI = [(postoperative total liver volume {TLV} - future liver remnant volume {FLRV}/FLRV] × 100 %. Hepatic dysfunction was defined according to the "TBilpeak>7" standard, which was interpreted as (peak) total bilirubin (TBil) >7.0 mg/dL. Good liver regeneration was defined solely when the RI surpassed the median with hepatic dysfunction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate prognostic factors affecting liver regeneration.

Result: A total of 153 patients were enrolled, with 33 in the benign group and 120 patients in the malignant group. In the entire study population, FLRV% [OR 4.087 (1.405-11.889), P = 0.010], international normalized ratio (INR) [OR 2.763 (95%CI, 1.008-7.577), P = 0.048] and TBil [OR 2.592 (95%CI, 1.177-5.710), P = 0.018] were independent prognostic factors associated with liver regeneration. In the benign group, only the computed tomography (CT) parameter FLRV% [OR, 11.700 (95%CI, 1.265-108.200), P = 0.030] predicted regeneration. In the malignant group, parenchymal hepatic resection rate (PHRR%) [OR 0.141 (95%CI, 0.040-0.499), P = 0.002] and TBil [OR 3.384 (95%CI, 1.377-8.319), P = 0.008] were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion: FLRV%, PHRR%, TBil and INR were predictive factors associated with liver regeneration.

References
1.
Mendes Luz J, Gomes F, Vasco Costa N, Vasco I, Coimbra E, Luz P . BestFLR Trial: Liver Regeneration at CT before Major Hepatectomies for Liver Cancer-A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Portal Vein Embolization with -Butyl-Cyanoacrylate Plus Iodized Oil versus Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles Plus Coils. Radiology. 2021; 299(3):715-724. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204055. View

2.
Chang T, Hakamada K, Toyoki Y, Tsuchida S, Sasaki M . Expression of MRP2 and MRP3 during liver regeneration after 90% partial hepatectomy in rats. Transplantation. 2004; 77(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000089234.93366.6D. View

3.
Michalopoulos G, Bhushan B . Liver regeneration: biological and pathological mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(1):40-55. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0342-4. View

4.
Abdalla E, Denys A, Chevalier P, Nemr R, Vauthey J . Total and segmental liver volume variations: implications for liver surgery. Surgery. 2004; 135(4):404-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2003.08.024. View

5.
Inoue Y, Fujii K, Ishii M, Kagota S, Tomioka A, Hamamoto H . Volumetric and Functional Regeneration of Remnant Liver after Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 23(5):914-921. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3985-5. View