» Articles » PMID: 38803413

Continuous and Unconstrained Tremor Monitoring in Parkinson's Disease Using Supervised Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

Overview
Journal Parkinsons Dis
Publisher Wiley
Date 2024 May 28
PMID 38803413
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurately assessing the severity and frequency of fluctuating motor symptoms is important at all stages of Parkinson's disease management. Contrarily to time-consuming clinical testing or patient self-reporting with uncertain reliability, recordings with wearable sensors show promise as a tool for continuously and objectively assessing PD symptoms. While wearables-based clinical assessments during standardised and scripted tasks have been successfully implemented, assessments during unconstrained activity remain a challenge.

Methods: We developed and implemented a supervised machine learning algorithm, trained and tested on tremor scores. We evaluated the algorithm on a 67-hour database comprising sensor data and clinical tremor scores for 24 Parkinson patients at four extremities for periods of about 3 hours. A random 25% subset of the labelled samples was used as test data, the remainder as training data. Based on features extracted from the sensor data, a Support Vector Machine was trained to predict tremor severity. Due to the inherent imbalance in tremor scores, we applied dataset rebalancing techniques.

Results: Our classifier demonstrated robust performance in detecting tremor events with a sensitivity of 0.90 on the test-portion of the resampled dataset. The overall classification accuracy was high at 0.88.

Conclusion: We implemented an accurate classifier for tremor monitoring in free-living environments that can be trained even with modestly sized and imbalanced datasets. This advancement offers significant clinical value in continuously monitoring Parkinson's disease symptoms beyond the hospital setting, paving the way for personalized management of PD, timely therapeutic adjustments, and improved patient quality of life.

References
1.
Kraskov A, Stogbauer H, Grassberger P . Estimating mutual information. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 69(6 Pt 2):066138. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138. View

2.
de Lau L, Breteler M . Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5(6):525-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9. View

3.
Espay A, Bonato P, Nahab F, Maetzler W, Dean J, Klucken J . Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord. 2016; 31(9):1272-82. PMC: 5014594. DOI: 10.1002/mds.26642. View

4.
Costa J, Gonzalez H, Valldeoriola F, Gaig C, Tolosa E, Valls-Sole J . Nonlinear dynamic analysis of oscillatory repetitive movements in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010; 25(15):2577-86. DOI: 10.1002/mds.23334. View

5.
Ruegge D, Mahendran S, Stieglitz L, Oertel M, Gassert R, Lambercy O . Tremor analysis with wearable sensors correlates with outcome after thalamic deep brain stimulation. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2021; 3:100066. PMC: 8298798. DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100066. View