Technical Efficiency and Its Convergence Among Village Clinics in Rural China: Evidence from Shanxi Province

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 May 27

PMID 38799685

Authors

Yun Ye

Richard Evans

Xiaojun Huang

Wei Xu

Wei Lu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Village clinics (VCs) are the foundation of the three-tiered health service system in China, delivering basic and routine outpatient services to citizens in rural China. VC technical efficiency and its convergence play a critical role in policy decisions regarding the distribution of health service resources in rural China.

Methods: This study measured VC technical efficiency (using the slacks-based measure model), its convergence (using the convergence model), and the factors that influence the convergence in Shanxi Province, China. Data were obtained from the , which involved 3,543 VCs.

Results: The results showed that VC technical efficiency was low and differed by region. There was no α convergence in VC technical efficiency, but evidence of β convergence was found in Shanxi. The main factors that influence convergence were the building area of each VC (BA), proportion of government subsidies (PGS), and ratio of total expenditure to total income of each VC (RTETI).

Conclusion: The government should increase investments in VCs and improve VC technical efficiency. Meanwhile, the government should be aware of and take measures to curb the inequity in VC technical efficiency among different regions and take suitable measures to curb this disparity.

References

Liu W, Hsu C, Liu T, Chen P, Zheng B, Chien C . Systematic Review of the Effect of a Zero-Markup Policy for Essential Drugs on Healthcare Costs and Utilization in China, 2015-2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:618046. PMC: 8339310. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.618046. View

Shen Y, Sun Z . Estimating the spatial correlation and convergence of China's healthcare resources allocation: evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Region. Arch Public Health. 2022; 80(1):207. PMC: 9471039. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00958-4. View

Li X, Krumholz H, Yip W, Cheng K, De Maeseneer J, Meng Q . Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. Lancet. 2020; 395(10239):1802-1812. PMC: 7272159. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7. View

Kirigia J, Sambo L, Renner A, Alemu W, Seasa S, Bah Y . Technical efficiency of primary health units in Kailahun and Kenema districts of Sierra Leone. Int Arch Med. 2011; 4:15. PMC: 3108938. DOI: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-15. View

Zhang Y, Wang Q, Jiang T, Wang J . Equity and efficiency of primary health care resource allocation in mainland China. Int J Equity Health. 2018; 17(1):140. PMC: 6134520. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0851-8. View

Matos R, Ferreira D, Pedro M . Economic Analysis of Portuguese Public Hospitals Through the Construction of Quality, Efficiency, Access, and Financial Related Composite Indicators. Soc Indic Res. 2021; 157(1):361-392. PMC: 7945611. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02650-6. View

Wang Z . The convergence of health care expenditure in the US states. Health Econ. 2008; 18(1):55-70. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1343. View

Hernandez A, San Sebastian M . Assessing the technical efficiency of health posts in rural Guatemala: a data envelopment analysis. Glob Health Action. 2014; 7:23190. PMC: 3901389. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v7.23190. View

Liu W, Liu Y, Twum P, Li S . National equity of health resource allocation in China: data from 2009 to 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016; 15:68. PMC: 4837535. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0357-1. View

10.

Sherman H . Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation. Empirical test of a new technique. Med Care. 1984; 22(10):922-38. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198410000-00005. View

11.

Kontodimopoulos N, Nanos P, Niakas D . Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece. Health Policy. 2005; 76(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.006. View

12.

Li X, Lu J, Hu S, Cheng K, De Maeseneer J, Meng Q . The primary health-care system in China. Lancet. 2017; 390(10112):2584-2594. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. View

13.

Chen Y, Sylvia S, Wu P, Yi H . Explaining the declining utilization of village clinics in rural China over time: A decomposition approach. Soc Sci Med. 2022; 301:114978. PMC: 10266832. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114978. View

14.

Zhong K, Chen L, Cheng S, Chen H, Long F . The Efficiency of Primary Health Care Institutions in the Counties of Hunan Province, China: Data from 2009 to 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5). PMC: 7084797. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051781. View

15.

Qin W, Xu L, Li J, Sun L, Ding G, Shao H . Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2018; 17(1):61. PMC: 5960158. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3. View

16.

Marschall P, Flessa S . Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis. Health Econ Rev. 2012; 1(1):5. PMC: 3395044. DOI: 10.1186/2191-1991-1-5. View

17.

Mohammadpour S, Javan-Noughabi J, Najar A, Zangeneh M, Yousefi S, Nouhi M . Factors affecting the technical efficiency of rural primary health care centers in Hamadan, Iran: data envelopment analysis and Tobit regression. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020; 18(1):53. PMC: 7684939. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-020-00249-1. View

18.

Mei K, Kou R, Bi Y, Liu Y, Huang J, Li W . A study of primary health care service efficiency and its spatial correlation in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):247. PMC: 10012696. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09197-x. View

19.

Zhang G, Zhang L, Wu S, Xia X, Lu L . The convergence of Chinese county government health expenditures: capitation and contribution. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):408. PMC: 4991013. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1635-8. View

20.

Oikonomou N, Tountas Y, Mariolis A, Souliotis K, Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos J . Measuring the efficiency of the Greek rural primary health care using a restricted DEA model; the case of southern and western Greece. Health Care Manag Sci. 2015; 19(4):313-325. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-015-9324-4. View