» Articles » PMID: 38796537

Comparison of Early Visual Outcomes After SMILE Using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 for Myopia: a Retrospective Matched Case-control Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38796537
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

VISUMAX 800 was introduced to improve the patient experience and clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This was a retrospective, matched, and case-control study (1:2) controlled for preoperative central corneal thickness and refractive error that compared early refractive and visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 to treat myopia. We included 50 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 800 SMILE and 100 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 500 SMILE. SMILE using VISUMAX 800 was performed using the CentraLign aid for vertex centration. Cyclotorsion was controlled by an OcuLign assistant in the VISUMAX 800 group after corneal marking. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated using a Pentacam 1 month after surgery. No differences were observed in the pre- and post-operative refractive and visual outcomes at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. VISUMAX 800 induced less total HOAs than VISUMAX 500 (P = 0.036). No statistically significant differences were observed in the amounts of induced spherical aberrations or vertical and horizontal comas. No differences were observed in the 1 month and 6 months refractive and visual outcomes between two SMILE procedures, except for VISUMAX 800, which resulted in lower postoperative total HOAs than VISUMAX 500.

Citing Articles

The Efficiency, Predictability and Safety Between Custom-Q Femotsecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Second (Visumax 800) Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery.

Lee C, Yang S, Lian I, Chen H, Huang J, Chang C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075880 PMC: 11898440. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050634.


Three-Month Outcomes of SMILE Pro with the VISUMAX 800 for Myopic Astigmatism in a Large Population.

Cung H, Tran L, Tran T Clin Ophthalmol. 2025; 19:417-425.

PMID: 39935797 PMC: 11812556. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S502915.


Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes Between Refractive Lens Exchange and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery in Moderate to High Myopia.

Lee C, Yang S, Chen H, Lian I, Huang J, Chang C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795571 PMC: 11719743. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010043.


Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800.

Varman A, Varman A, Balakumar D Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:3557-3566.

PMID: 39635258 PMC: 11616419. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S492552.


The Risk Factors for Myopia Undercorrection in Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Lee C, Yang S, Chen H, Lian I, Huang C, Huang J Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202239 PMC: 11354104. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161752.


References
1.
Saad A, Klabe K, Kirca M, Kretz F, Auffarth G, Breyer D . Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser. Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):52. PMC: 10858925. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-02915-2. View

2.
Yoo T, Ryu I, Choi H, Kim J, Lee I, Kim J . Explainable Machine Learning Approach as a Tool to Understand Factors Used to Select the Refractive Surgery Technique on the Expert Level. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9(2):8. PMC: 7346876. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.8. View

3.
Li F, Yang Y, Bao F, Cheng D, Zhu J, Ye Y . Comparison of Astigmatic Correction With and Without Cross-axis Alignment During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. J Refract Surg. 2022; 38(10):624-631. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20220830-01. View

4.
Huang G, Melki S . Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): Myths and Realities. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021; 36(4):140-148. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1887897. View

5.
Sia R, Ryan D, Beydoun H, Eaddy J, Logan L, Rodgers S . Visual outcomes after SMILE from the first-year experience at a U.S. military refractive surgery center and comparison with PRK and LASIK outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020; 46(7):995-1002. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000203. View