» Articles » PMID: 38794408

Sulfated Nutrition Modifies Nutrient Content and Photosynthetic Pigment Concentration in Cabbage Under Salt Stress

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38794408
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Negative effects of salt stress may be counteracted by adequate management of sulfated nutrition. Herein, we applied 3.50, 4.25, and 5.00 mM SO in a nutrient solution to counteract salt stress induced by 75 and 150 mM NaCl in cabbage cv. Royal. The increase in NaCl concentration from 75 to 150 mM reduced the contents of macronutrients and micronutrients in the shoot. When increasing from 3.50 to 4.25 mM SO, the contents of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) in shoots were enhanced, at both concentrations of NaCl. Increasing from 3.50 to 4.25 mM SO enhanced iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and sodium (Na) concentrations with 75 mM NaCl. With 150 mM NaCl, the increase from 3.50 to 4.25 mM SO enhanced the contents of Cu and Mn, but also those of Na. Chlorophylls a, b, and total decreased as the concentration of SO increased in plants treated with 150 mM NaCl. With 75 mM NaCl, carotenoid concentration had a positive relationship with SO. Hence, the 4.25 mM SO concentration increased the contents of macronutrients and micronutrients in the presence of 75 mM NaCl, while, with 150 mM NaCl, it improved the contents of macronutrients except K. The chlorophyll a/chlorophyll b ratio remained close to 3 when the plants were treated with 5.00 mM SO, regardless of NaCl. Similarly, this level of SO increased the concentration of carotenoids, which translated into reductions in the total chlorophyll/carotenoid ratios, indicating a protective effect of the photosynthetic apparatus. It is concluded that higher doses of sulfur favor the accumulation of nutrients and increase the concentration of carotenoids under salt stress.

Citing Articles

Morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses of three different soybean ( L.) varieties under salinity stress conditions.

Kokebie D, Enyew A, Masresha G, Fentie T, Mulat E Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1440445.

PMID: 39354934 PMC: 11443463. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1440445.

References
1.
Bjorn L, Papageorgiou G, Blankenship R, Govindjee . A viewpoint: why chlorophyll a?. Photosynth Res. 2009; 99(2):85-98. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-008-9395-x. View

2.
Cao M, Wang Z, Zhao Q, Mao J, Speiser A, Wirtz M . Sulfate availability affects ABA levels and germination response to ABA and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013; 77(4):604-15. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12407. View

3.
Leiva-Ampuero A, Agurto M, Matus J, Hoppe G, Huidobro C, Inostroza-Blancheteau C . Salinity impairs photosynthetic capacity and enhances carotenoid-related gene expression and biosynthesis in tomato ( L. cv. Micro-Tom). PeerJ. 2020; 8:e9742. PMC: 7502237. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9742. View

4.
Visha Kumari V, Banerjee P, Verma V, Sukumaran S, Chandran M, Gopinath K . Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(15). PMC: 9368943. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158519. View

5.
Rabhi M, Barhoumi Z, Ksouri R, Abdelly C, Gharsalli M . Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency in Medicago ciliaris. C R Biol. 2007; 330(11):779-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.007. View