» Articles » PMID: 38794060

Efficacy of a Single-Bout of Auditory Feedback Training on Gait Performance and Kinematics in Healthy Young Adults

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38794060
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the immediate effects of auditory feedback training on gait performance and kinematics in 19 healthy young adults, focusing on bilateral changes, despite unilateral training. Baseline and post-training kinematic measurements, as well as the feedback training were performed on a treadmill with a constant velocity. Significant improvements were seen in step length (trained: 590.7 mm to 611.1 mm, 95%CI [7.609, 24.373]; untrained: 591.1 mm to 628.7 mm, 95%CI [10.698, 30.835]), toe clearance (trained: 13.9 mm to 16.5 mm, 95%CI [1.284, 3.503]; untrained: 11.8 mm to 13.7 mm, 95%CI [1.763, 3.612]), ankle dorsiflexion angle at terminal stance (trained: 8.3 deg to 10.5 deg, 95%CI [1.092, 3.319]; untrained: 9.2 deg to 12.0 deg, 95%CI [1.676, 3.573]), hip flexion angular velocity, (trained: -126.5 deg/s to -131.0 deg/s, 95%CI [-9.054, -2.623]; untrained: -130.2 deg/s to -135.3 deg/s, 95%CI [-10.536, -1.675]), ankle angular velocity at terminal stance (trained: -344.7 deg/s to -359.1 deg/s, 95%CI [-47.540, -14.924]; untrained: -340.3 deg/s to -376.9 deg/s, 95%CI [-37.280, -13.166s]), and gastrocnemius EMG activity (trained: 0.60 to 0.66, 95%CI [0.014, 0.258]; untrained: 0.55 to 0.65, 95%CI [0.049, 0.214]). These findings demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback training in enhancing key gait parameters, highlighting the bilateral benefits from unilateral training.

Citing Articles

A review of concurrent sonified biofeedback in balance and gait training.

Zaferiou A, Hirsch Z, Bacani T, Dahl L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):38.

PMID: 40011952 PMC: 11866693. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01565-4.

References
1.
Pang M, Yang J . The initiation of the swing phase in human infant stepping: importance of hip position and leg loading. J Physiol. 2000; 528 Pt 2:389-404. PMC: 2270131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00389.x. View

2.
Lelas J, Merriman G, Riley P, Kerrigan D . Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed. Gait Posture. 2003; 17(2):106-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00060-7. View

3.
Spencer J, Wolf S, Kesar T . Biofeedback for Post-stroke Gait Retraining: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Directions in the Context of Emerging Technologies. Front Neurol. 2021; 12:637199. PMC: 8042129. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.637199. View

4.
Ginis P, Pirani R, Basaia S, Ferrari A, Chiari L, Heremans E . Focusing on heel strike improves toe clearance in people with Parkinson's disease: an observational pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2017; 103(4):485-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.05.001. View

5.
Byl N, Zhang W, Coo S, Tomizuka M . Clinical impact of gait training enhanced with visual kinematic biofeedback: Patients with Parkinson's disease and patients stable post stroke. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 79(Pt B):332-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.020. View