» Articles » PMID: 38793120

Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 May 25
PMID 38793120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy.

Methods: A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009.

Results: Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation.

Conclusions: In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.

References
1.
Oehlke O, Mix M, Graf E, Schimek-Jasch T, Nestle U, Gotz I . Amino-acid PET versus MRI guided re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GLIAA) - protocol of a randomized phase II trial (NOA 10/ARO 2013-1). BMC Cancer. 2016; 16(1):769. PMC: 5052714. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2806-z. View

2.
Hasan S, Chen E, Lanciano R, Yang J, Hanlon A, Lamond J . Salvage Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with or without Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Single Institution Experience. Front Oncol. 2015; 5:106. PMC: 4432688. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00106. View

3.
Constine L, Konski A, Ekholm S, McDonald S, Rubin P . Adverse effects of brain irradiation correlated with MR and CT imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988; 15(2):319-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)90011-6. View

4.
Lautenschlaeger F, Dumke R, Schymalla M, Hauswald H, Carl B, Stein M . Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma. Strahlenther Onkol. 2021; 198(5):427-435. PMC: 9038837. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01844-8. View

5.
Scartoni D, Amelio D, Palumbo P, Giacomelli I, Amichetti M . Proton therapy re-irradiation preserves health-related quality of life in large recurrent glioblastoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020; 146(6):1615-1622. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03187-w. View