Multiple Object Tracking in the Presence of a Goal: Attentional Anticipation and Suppression

Overview

Journal J Vis

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2024 May 24

PMID 38787571

Authors

Andrea Frielink-Loing

Arno Koning

Rob van Lier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In previous studies, we found that tracking multiple objects involves anticipatory attention, especially in the linear direction, even when a target bounced against a wall. We also showed that active involvement, in which the wall was replaced by a controllable paddle, resulted in increased allocation of attention to the bounce direction. In the current experiments, we wanted to further investigate the potential influence of the valence of the heading of an object. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were instructed to catch targets with a movable goal. In Experiment 3, participants were instructed to manipulate the permeability of a static wall in order to let targets either approach goals (i.e., green goals) or avoid goals (i.e., red goals). The results of Experiment 1 showed that probe detection ahead of a target that moved in the direction of the goal was higher as compared to probe detection in the direction of a no-goal area. Experiment 2 provided further evidence that the attentional highlighting found in the first experiment depends on the movement direction toward the goal. In Experiment 3, we found that not so much the positive (or neutral) valence (here, the green and no-goal areas) led to increased allocation of attention but rather a negative valence (here the red goals) led to a decreased allocation of attention.

References

Alvarez G, Scholl B . How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005; 134(4):461-76. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.46. View

Peirce J . Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform. 2009; 2:10. PMC: 2636899. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008. View

Pylyshyn Z, Storm R . Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat Vis. 1988; 3(3):179-97. DOI: 10.1163/156856888x00122. View

Flombaum J, Scholl B, Pylyshyn Z . Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: the high-beams effect. Cognition. 2008; 107(3):904-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.015. View

Keane B, Pylyshyn Z . Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function. Cogn Psychol. 2006; 52(4):346-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.12.001. View

Atsma J, Koning A, van Lier R . Multiple object tracking: anticipatory attention doesn't "bounce". J Vis. 2012; 12(13). DOI: 10.1167/12.13.1. View

Peirce J . PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 162(1-2):8-13. PMC: 2018741. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017. View

Yantis S . Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization. Cogn Psychol. 1992; 24(3):295-340. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90010-y. View

Zhong S, Ma Z, Wilson C, Liu Y, Flombaum J . Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation. J Vis. 2014; 14(12). PMC: 4196582. DOI: 10.1167/14.12.12. View

10.

Thornton I, Bulthoff H, Horowitz T, Rynning A, Lee S . Interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT). PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e86974. PMC: 3911935. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086974. View

11.

Renton A, Painter D, Mattingley J . Differential Deployment of Visual Attention During Interactive Approach and Avoidance Behavior. Cereb Cortex. 2018; 29(6):2366-2383. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy105. View

12.

Howe P, Holcombe A . Motion information is sometimes used as an aid to the visual tracking of objects. J Vis. 2012; 12(13):10. DOI: 10.1167/12.13.10. View

13.

Alvarez G, Franconeri S . How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. J Vis. 2007; 7(13):14.1-10. DOI: 10.1167/7.13.14. View

14.

Hickey C, Chelazzi L, Theeuwes J . Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(33):11096-103. PMC: 6633486. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010. View

15.

Posner M . Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980; 32(1):3-25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231. View

16.

Frielink-Loing A, Koning A, van Lier R . Distinguishing influences of overt and covert attention in anticipatory attentional target tracking. J Vis. 2017; 17(4):3. DOI: 10.1167/17.4.3. View

17.

Cavanagh P, Alvarez G . Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(7):349-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009. View

18.

Drew T, McCollough A, Horowitz T, Vogel E . Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(2):411-7. PMC: 2906218. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.411. View

19.

Frielink-Loing A, Koning A, van Lier R . Influences of active control on attention allocation in MOT. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(3):671-681. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02417-8. View

20.

Anderson B, Laurent P, Yantis S . Value-driven attentional capture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(25):10367-71. PMC: 3121816. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108. View