» Articles » PMID: 38787413

Development of a Biomarker Signature Associated with Anoikis to Predict Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response in Melanoma

Overview
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2024 May 24
PMID 38787413
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is malignant cancer known for its high aggressiveness and unfavorable prognosis, particularly in advanced tumors. Anoikis is a specific pattern of programmed cell death associated with tumor regeneration, migration, and metastasis. Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted to investigate the function of anoikis in SKCM. Anoikis-related genes (ARGs) were extracted from Genecards to identify SKCM subtypes and to explore the immune microenvironment between the different subtypes. Prognostic models of SKCM were developed by LASSO COX regression analysis. Subsequently, the predictive value of risk scores in SKCM and the association with immunotherapy were further explored. Finally, the expression of 6 ARGs involved in the model construction was detected by immunohistochemistry and PCR. This study identified 20 ARGs significantly associated with SKCM prognosis and performed disease subtype analysis of samples based on these genes, different subtypes exhibited significantly different clinical features and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) landscapes. The risk score prognostic model was generated by further screening and identification of the six ARGs. The model exhibited a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to predict the prognosis of individuals with SKCM. These high- and low-risk populations showed different immune statuses and drug sensitivity. Further immunohistochemical and PCR experiments identified significant differential expression of the six ARGs in tumor and normal samples. Anoikis-based features may serve as novel prognostic biomarkers for SKCM and may provide important new insights for survival prediction and individualized treatment development.

References
1.
Gandini S, Autier P, Boniol M . Reviews on sun exposure and artificial light and melanoma. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011; 107(3):362-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.011. View

2.
Ahmed B, Qadir M, Ghafoor S . Malignant Melanoma: Skin Cancer-Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2020; 30(4):291-297. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2020028454. View

3.
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Basset-Seguin N . European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022. Eur J Cancer. 2022; 170:236-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.008. View

4.
Frauchiger A, Mangana J, Rechsteiner M, Moch H, Seifert B, Braun R . Prognostic relevance of lactate dehydrogenase and serum S100 levels in stage IV melanoma with known BRAF mutation status. Br J Dermatol. 2015; 174(4):823-30. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14347. View

5.
Raigani S, Cohen S, Boland G . The Role of Surgery for Melanoma in an Era of Effective Systemic Therapy. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017; 19(3):17. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0575-8. View