» Articles » PMID: 38786288

Artificial Intelligence-Based Quality Assessment of Histopathology Whole-Slide Images Within a Clinical Workflow: Assessment of 'PathProfiler' in a Diagnostic Pathology Setting

Abstract

Digital pathology continues to gain momentum, with the promise of artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis and for assessment of features which may impact prognosis and clinical management. Successful adoption of these technologies depends upon the quality of digitised whole-slide images (WSI); however, current quality control largely depends upon manual assessment, which is inefficient and subjective. We previously developed PathProfiler, an automated image quality assessment tool, and in this feasibility study we investigate its potential for incorporation into a diagnostic clinical pathology setting in real-time. A total of 1254 genitourinary WSI were analysed by PathProfiler. PathProfiler was developed and trained on prostate tissue and, of the prostate biopsy WSI, representing 46% of the WSI analysed, 4.5% were flagged as potentially being of suboptimal quality for diagnosis. All had concordant subjective issues, mainly focus-related, 54% severe enough to warrant remedial action which resulted in improved image quality. PathProfiler was less reliable in assessment of non-prostate surgical resection-type cases, on which it had not been trained. PathProfiler shows potential for incorporation into a digitised clinical pathology workflow, with opportunity for image quality improvement. Whilst its reliability in the current form appears greatest for assessment of prostate specimens, other specimen types, particularly biopsies, also showed benefit.

Citing Articles

GrandQC: A comprehensive solution to quality control problem in digital pathology.

Weng Z, Seper A, Pryalukhin A, Mairinger F, Wickenhauser C, Bauer M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10685.

PMID: 39681557 PMC: 11649692. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54769-y.


Spatial transcriptomic approaches for characterising the bone marrow landscape: pitfalls and potential.

Cooper R, Thomas E, Sozanska A, Pescia C, Royston D Leukemia. 2024; 39(2):291-295.

PMID: 39609595 PMC: 11794127. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02480-8.


Enhancing Medical Imaging Segmentation with GB-SAM: A Novel Approach to Tissue Segmentation Using Granular Box Prompts.

Villanueva-Miranda I, Rong R, Quan P, Wen Z, Zhan X, Yang D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001452 PMC: 11240495. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132391.

References
1.
Schomig-Markiefka B, Pryalukhin A, Hulla W, Bychkov A, Fukuoka J, Madabhushi A . Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology. Mod Pathol. 2021; 34(12):2098-2108. PMC: 8592835. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00859-x. View

2.
Hanna M, Ardon O, Reuter V, Sirintrapun S, England C, Klimstra D . Correction: Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol. 2021; 35(2):286. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00968-7. View

3.
Williams B, DaCosta P, Goacher E, Treanor D . A Systematic Analysis of Discordant Diagnoses in Digital Pathology Compared With Light Microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017; 141(12):1712-1718. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0494-OA. View

4.
Michielli N, Caputo A, Scotto M, Mogetta A, Pennisi O, Molinari F . Stain normalization in digital pathology: Clinical multi-center evaluation of image quality. J Pathol Inform. 2022; 13:100145. PMC: 9577129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100145. View

5.
Colling R, Protheroe A, Sullivan M, Macpherson R, Tuthill M, Redgwell J . Digital Pathology Transformation in a Supraregional Germ Cell Tumour Network. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(12). PMC: 8700654. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122191. View