» Articles » PMID: 38784683

Non-perennial Segments in River Networks

Overview
Date 2024 May 24
PMID 38784683
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-perennial river segments - those that recurrently cease to flow or frequently dry - occur in all river networks and are globally more abundant than perennial (always flowing) segments. However, research and management have historically focused on perennial river segments. In this Review, we outline how non-perennial segments are integral parts of river networks. Repeated cycles of flowing, non-flowing and dry phases in non-perennial segments influence biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics at different spatial scales, from individual segments to entire river networks. Varying configurations of perennial and non-perennial segments govern physical, chemical and ecological responses to changes in the flow regimes of each river network, especially in response to human activities. The extent of non-perennial segments in river networks has increased owing to warming, changing hydrological patterns and human activities, and this increase is predicted to continue. Moreover, the dry phases of flow regimes are expected to be longer, drier and more frequent, albeit with high regional variability. These changes will likely impact biodiversity, potentially tipping some ecosystems to compromised stable states. Effective river-network management must recognize ecosystem services (such as flood risk management and groundwater recharge) provided by non-perennial segments and ensure their legislative and regulatory protection, which is often lacking.

Citing Articles

River Drying Causes Local Losses and Regional Gains in Aquatic Invertebrate Metacommunity Diversity: A Cross-Continental Comparison.

Escobar-Camacho D, Crabot J, Stubbington R, England J, Sarremejane R, Bonada N Glob Chang Biol. 2025; 31(2):e70068.

PMID: 39950585 PMC: 11826973. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70068.


Longitudinal propagation of aquatic disturbances following the largest wildfire recorded in New Mexico, USA.

Nichols J, Joseph E, Kaphle A, Tunby P, Rodriguez L, Khandelwal A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7143.

PMID: 39164242 PMC: 11336131. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51306-9.

References
1.
Krabbenhoft C, Allen G, Lin P, Godsey S, Allen D, Burrows R . Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network. Nat Sustain. 2022; 5:586-592. PMC: 9534037. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0. View

2.
Tonkin J, Poff N, Bond N, Horne A, Merritt D, Reynolds L . Prepare river ecosystems for an uncertain future. Nature. 2019; 570(7761):301-303. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01877-1. View

3.
Fournier R, de Mendoza G, Sarremejane R, Ruhi A . Isolation controls reestablishment mechanisms and post-drying community structure in an intermittent stream. Ecology. 2022; 104(2):e3911. PMC: 10078480. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3911. View

4.
Moore J, Beakes M, Nesbitt H, Yeakel J, Patterson D, Thompson L . Emergent stability in a large, free-flowing watershed. Ecology. 2015; 96(2):340-7. DOI: 10.1890/14-0326.1. View

5.
Milly P, Dunne K . Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science. 2020; 367(6483):1252-1255. DOI: 10.1126/science.aay9187. View