» Articles » PMID: 38784681

Implementation of Digital Health Technologies for Older Adults: a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Front Aging
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 May 24
PMID 38784681
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The critical importance of technological innovation in home care for older adults is indisputable. Less well understood is the question of how to measure its performance and impact on the delivery of healthcare to older adults who are living with chronic illness and disability. Knowing how well digital technologies, such as smartphones, tablets, wearable devices, and Ambient Assisted Living Technologies (AAL) systems "work" should certainly include assessing their impact on older adults' health and ability to function in daily living but that will not guarantee that it will necessarily be adopted by the user or implemented by a healthcare facility or the healthcare system. Technology implementation is a process of planned and guided activities to launch, introduce and support technologies in a certain context to innovate or improve healthcare, which delivers the evidence for adoption and upscaling a technology in healthcare practices. Factors in addition to user acceptance and clinical effectiveness require investigation. Failure to appreciate these factors can result in increased likelihood of technology rejection or protracted procurement decision at the "adoption decision" stage or delayed or incomplete implementation or discontinuance (following initial adoption) during implementation. The aim of our research to analyze research studies on the effectiveness of digital health technologies for older adults to answer the question, "How well do these studies address factors that affect the implementation of technology?" We found common problems with the conceptualization, design, and methodology in studies of digital technology that have contributed to the slow pace of implementation in home care and long-term care. We recommend a framework for improving the quality of research in this critical area. https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-f56rb-v1, identifier osf-registrations-f56rb-v1.

Citing Articles

Impact of functional level on cognitive function in adults aged 45 and older than 45 years in the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Lee H, Park E Australas J Ageing. 2025; 44(1):e70014.

PMID: 40051144 PMC: 11885896. DOI: 10.1111/ajag.70014.

References
1.
Reeder B, Chung J, Lazar A, Joe J, Demiris G, Thompson H . Testing a theory-based mobility monitoring protocol using in-home sensors: a feasibility study. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2013; 6(4):253-63. PMC: 4099136. DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20130729-02. View

2.
Bieryla K, Dold N . Feasibility of Wii Fit training to improve clinical measures of balance in older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2013; 8:775-81. PMC: 3699053. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S46164. View

3.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

4.
Neal D, van den Berg F, Planting C, Ettema T, Dijkstra K, Finnema E . Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(4). PMC: 7915697. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040604. View

5.
Fan J, Bian D, Zheng Z, Beuscher L, Newhouse P, Mion L . A Robotic Coach Architecture for Elder Care (ROCARE) Based on Multi-User Engagement Models. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017; 25(8):1153-1163. PMC: 5466518. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2608791. View