Suicide Prevention by Peers Offering Recovery Tactics (SUPPORT) for US Veterans With Serious Mental Illness: Community Engagement Approach

Overview

Journal J Particip Med

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2024 May 23

PMID 38781010

Authors

Samantha A Chalker

Jesus Serafez

Yuki Imai

Jeffrey Stinchcomb

Estefany Mendez

Colin A Depp

Elizabeth W Twamley

Karen L Fortuna

Marianne Goodman

Matthew Chinman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Peer specialists are hired, trained, and accredited to share their lived experience of psychiatric illness to support other similar individuals through the recovery process. There are limited data on the role of peer specialists in suicide prevention, including their role in intervention development.

Objective: To better understand peer specialists within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), we followed partnership community engagement and a formative research approach to intervention development to (1) identify barriers, facilitators, and perceptions of VHA peer specialists delivering a suicide prevention service and (2) develop and refine an intervention curriculum based on an evidence-informed preliminary intervention framework for veterans with serious mental illness (SMI).

Methods: Following the community engagement approach, VHA local and national peer support and mental health leaders, veterans with SMI, and veteran peer specialists met to develop a preliminary intervention framework. Next, VHA peer specialist advisors (n=5) and scientific advisors (n=6) participated in respective advisory boards and met every 2-4 months for more than 18 months via videoconferencing to address study objectives. The process used was a reflexive thematic analysis after each advisory board meeting.

Results: The themes discussed included (1) the desire for suicide prevention training for peer specialists, (2) determining the role of VHA peer specialists in suicide prevention, (3) integration of recovery themes in suicide prevention, and (4) difficulties using safety plans during a crisis. There were no discrepancies in thematic content between advisory boards. Advisor input led to the development of Suicide Prevention by Peers Offering Recovery Tactics (SUPPORT). SUPPORT includes training in general suicide prevention and a peer specialist-delivered intervention for veterans with SMI at an increased suicide risk. This training aims to increase the competence and confidence of peer specialists in suicide prevention and the intervention supports veterans with SMI at an increased suicide risk through their recovery process.

Conclusions: This paper intends to document the procedures taken in suicide prevention intervention development, specifically those led by peer specialists, and to be a source for future research developing and evaluating similar interventions.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05537376; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05537376.

References

Watling D, Preece M, Hawgood J, Bloomfield S, Kolves K . Developing an Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Rapid Review of Lived Experience Involvement. Arch Suicide Res. 2020; 26(2):465-480. DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2020.1833799. View

Chalker S, Parrish E, Martinez Ceren C, Depp C, Goodman M, Doran N . Predictive Importance of Social Contacts on U.S. Veteran Suicide Safety Plans. Psychiatr Serv. 2022; 74(3):244-249. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100699. View

Stanley B, Brown G, Brenner L, Galfalvy H, Currier G, Knox K . Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018; 75(9):894-900. PMC: 6142908. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776. View

OCathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Turner K . Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019; 5:41. PMC: 6419435. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6. View

Van Zanden B, Bliokas V . Taking the next step: A qualitative study examining processes of change in a suicide prevention program incorporating peer-workers. Psychol Serv. 2021; 19(3):508-518. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000445. View

Shelef D, Rand C, Streisand R, Horn I, Yadav K, Stewart L . Using stakeholder engagement to develop a patient-centered pediatric asthma intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 138(6):1512-1517. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.001. View

Vastine A, Gittelsohn J, Ethelbah B, Anliker J, Caballero B . Formative research and stakeholder participation in intervention development. Am J Health Behav. 2004; 29(1):57-69. DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.5. View

Bowersox N, Jagusch J, Garlick J, Chen J, Pfeiffer P . Peer-based interventions targeting suicide prevention: A scoping review. Am J Community Psychol. 2021; 68(1-2):232-248. PMC: 9165581. DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12510. View

Hendryx M, Green C, Perrin N . Social support, activities, and recovery from serious mental illness: STARS study findings. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008; 36(3):320-9. PMC: 2682629. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-008-9151-1. View

10.

Pfeiffer P, King C, Ilgen M, Ganoczy D, Clive R, Garlick J . Development and pilot study of a suicide prevention intervention delivered by peer support specialists. Psychol Serv. 2018; 16(3):360-371. PMC: 6494743. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000257. View

11.

Bornheimer L, Verdugo J, Holzworth J, Im V, Smith F, Sliwa H . Modifying a cognitive behavioral suicide prevention treatment for adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in community mental health. Psychiatry Res. 2022; 311:114505. PMC: 9373852. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114505. View

12.

Meerwijk E, Parekh A, Oquendo M, Allen I, Franck L, Lee K . Direct versus indirect psychosocial and behavioural interventions to prevent suicide and suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3(6):544-54. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00064-X. View

13.

Dixon L, Holoshitz Y, Nossel I . Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update. World Psychiatry. 2016; 15(1):13-20. PMC: 4780300. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20306. View

14.

Green M, Kern R, Heaton R . Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004; 72(1):41-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009. View

15.

Cook J, Copeland M, Jonikas J, Hamilton M, Razzano L, Grey D . Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using Wellness Recovery Action Planning. Schizophr Bull. 2011; 38(4):881-91. PMC: 3406522. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbr012. View

16.

Twamley E, Doshi R, Nayak G, Palmer B, Golshan S, Heaton R . Generalized cognitive impairments, ability to perform everyday tasks, and level of independence in community living situations of older patients with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(12):2013-20. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2013. View

17.

Corrigan P, Phelan S . Social support and recovery in people with serious mental illnesses. Community Ment Health J. 2005; 40(6):513-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-004-6125-5. View

18.

Twamley E, Vella L, Burton C, Heaton R, Jeste D . Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: effects in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012; 73(9):1212-9. PMC: 3593661. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m07686. View

19.

Fortuna K, Barr P, Goldstein C, Walker R, Brewer L, Zagaria A . Application of Community-Engaged Research to Inform the Development and Implementation of a Peer-Delivered Mobile Health Intervention for Adults With Serious Mental Illness. J Particip Med. 2020; 11(1):e12380. PMC: 7039401. DOI: 10.2196/12380. View

20.

Velligan D, Mahurin R, Diamond P, Hazleton B, Eckert S, Miller A . The functional significance of symptomatology and cognitive function in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1997; 25(1):21-31. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00010-8. View