» Articles » PMID: 38779314

Wings of Change: APKC/FoxP-dependent Plasticity in Steering Motor Neurons Underlies Operant Self-learning in

Overview
Journal F1000Res
Date 2024 May 23
PMID 38779314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Motor learning is central to human existence, such as learning to speak or walk, sports moves, or rehabilitation after injury. Evidence suggests that all forms of motor learning share an evolutionarily conserved molecular plasticity pathway. Here, we present novel insights into the neural processes underlying operant self-learning, a form of motor learning in the fruit fly

Methods: We operantly trained wild type and transgenic fruit flies, tethered at the torque meter, in a motor learning task that required them to initiate and maintain turning maneuvers around their vertical body axis (yaw torque). We combined this behavioral experiment with transgenic peptide expression, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated, spatio-temporally controlled gene knock-out and confocal microscopy.

Results: We find that expression of atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) in direct wing steering motoneurons co-expressing the transcription factor is necessary for this type of motor learning and that aPKC likely acts via non-canonical pathways. We also found that it takes more than a week for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of in adult animals to impair motor learning, suggesting that adult expression is required for operant self-learning.

Conclusions: Our experiments suggest that, for operant self-learning, a type of motor learning in , co-expression of atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and the transcription factor is necessary in direct wing steering motoneurons. Some of these neurons control the wing beat amplitude when generating optomotor responses, and we have discovered modulation of optomotor behavior after operant self-learning. We also discovered that aPKC likely acts via non-canonical pathways and that FoxP expression is also required in adult flies.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal dynamics of locomotor decisions in .

Lebovich L, Alisch T, Redhead E, Parker M, Loewenstein Y, Couzin I bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282352 PMC: 11398310. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.04.611038.

References
1.
Tendeiro J, Kiers H . A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing. Psychol Methods. 2019; 24(6):774-795. DOI: 10.1037/met0000221. View

2.
Gallimore A, Kim T, Tanaka-Yamamoto K, De Schutter E . Switching On Depression and Potentiation in the Cerebellum. Cell Rep. 2018; 22(3):722-733. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.084. View

3.
Zhang L, Wei X . The Roles of Par3, Par6, and aPKC Polarity Proteins in Normal Neurodevelopment and in Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. J Neurosci. 2022; 42(24):4774-4793. PMC: 9188383. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0059-22.2022. View

4.
Sakaguchi H . Effect of social factors on the development of PKC expression in songbird brain. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(18):2819-23. View

5.
Wang Y, Pillai S, Wolpaw J, Chen X . Motor learning changes GABAergic terminals on spinal motoneurons in normal rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 23(1):141-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04547.x. View