» Articles » PMID: 38777988

When the Interoceptive and Conceptual Clash: The Case of Oppositional Phenomenal Self-modelling in Tourette Syndrome

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 May 22
PMID 38777988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) has been associated with a rich set of symptoms that are said to be uncomfortable, unwilled, and effortful to manage. Furthermore, tics, the canonical characteristic of TS, are multifaceted, and their onset and maintenance is complex. A formal account that integrates these features of TS symptomatology within a plausible theoretical framework is currently absent from the field. In this paper, we assess the explanatory power of hierarchical generative modelling in accounting for TS symptomatology from the perspective of active inference. We propose a fourfold analysis of sensory, motor, and cognitive phenomena associated with TS. In Section 1, we characterise tics as a form of action aimed at sensory attenuation. In Section 2, we introduce the notion of epistemic ticcing and describe such behaviour as the search for evidence that there is an agent (i.e., self) at the heart of the generative hierarchy. In Section 3, we characterise both epistemic (sensation-free) and nonepistemic (sensational) tics as habitual behaviour. Finally, in Section 4, we propose that ticcing behaviour involves an inevitable conflict between distinguishable aspects of selfhood; namely, between the minimal phenomenal sense of self-which is putatively underwritten by interoceptive inference-and the explicit preferences that constitute the individual's conceptual sense of self. In sum, we aim to provide an empirically informed analysis of TS symptomatology under active inference, revealing a continuity between covert and overt features of the condition.

Citing Articles

Flow and intuition: a systems neuroscience comparison.

Kotler S, Parvizi-Wayne D, Mannino M, Friston K Neurosci Conscious. 2025; 2025(1):niae040.

PMID: 39777155 PMC: 11700884. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae040.


Forgetting ourselves in flow: an active inference account of flow states and how we experience ourselves within them.

Parvizi-Wayne D, Sandved-Smith L, Pitliya R, Limanowski J, Tufft M, Friston K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1354719.

PMID: 38887627 PMC: 11182004. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354719.

References
1.
Limanowski J, Blankenburg F . Minimal self-models and the free energy principle. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:547. PMC: 3770917. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00547. View

1.
Adams R, Shipp S, Friston K . Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Struct Funct. 2012; 218(3):611-43. PMC: 3637647. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5. View

2.
Albin R, Mink J . Recent advances in Tourette syndrome research. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29(3):175-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.01.001. View

3.
Aron A, Herz D, Brown P, Forstmann B, Zaghloul K . Frontosubthalamic Circuits for Control of Action and Cognition. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(45):11489-11495. PMC: 5125216. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-16.2016. View

4.
Barrett L . The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016; 12(1):1-23. PMC: 5390700. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw154. View