» Articles » PMID: 38777579

Redefining Migraine Prevention: Early Treatment with Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Enhances Response in the Real World

Abstract

Background: Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) are approved and available treatments for migraine prevention. Patients do not respond alike and many countries have reimbursement policies, which hinder treatments to those who might respond. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with good and excellent response to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months.

Methods: European multicentre, prospective, real-world study, including high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine (CM) patients treated since March 2018 with anti-CGRP MAbs. We defined good and excellent responses as ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) at 6 months, respectively. Generalised mixed-effect regression models (GLMMs) were used to identify variables independently associated with treatment response.

Results: Of the 5818 included patients, 82.3% were females and the median age was 48.0 (40.0-55.0) years. At baseline, the median of MHD was 20.0 (14.0-28.0) days/months and 72.2% had a diagnosis of CM. At 6 months (n=4963), 56.5% (2804/4963) were good responders and 26.7% (1324/4963) were excellent responders. In the GLMM model, older age (1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), p=0.016), the presence of unilateral pain (1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.60), p<0.001), the absence of depression (0.840 (95% CI 0.731 to 0.966), p=0.014), less monthly migraine days (0.923 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.989), p=0.023) and lower Migraine Disability Assessment at baseline (0.874 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.932), p<0.001) were predictors of good response (AUC of 0.648 (95% CI 0.616 to 0.680)). These variables were also significant predictors of excellent response (AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.651 to 0.731)). Sex was not significant in the GLMM models.

Conclusions: This is the largest real-world study of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. It provides evidence that higher migraine frequency and greater disability at baseline reduce the likelihood of responding to anti-CGRP MAbs, informing physicians and policy-makers on the need for an earlier treatment in order to offer the best chance of treatment success.

Citing Articles

Menopause, Perimenopause, and Migraine: Understanding the Intersections and Implications for Treatment.

Waliszewska-Prosol M, Grandi G, Ornello R, Raffaelli B, Straburzynski M, Tana C Neurol Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 40085393 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-025-00720-2.


Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization by Gender and Migraine Frequency in Adult Patients Receiving Galcanezumab Versus Standard of Care Preventive Medications Over 24 months: A United States Retrospective Claims Study.

Varnado O, Vu M, Buysman E, Kim G, Allenback G, Hoyt M Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:543-567.

PMID: 40046564 PMC: 11881638. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S492300.


Mechanistic approach and therapeutic strategies in menstrual and non-menstrual migraine.

Mani T, Murtaza M, Begum R, Gayathri H, Sumithra M Future Sci OA. 2025; 11(1):2468109.

PMID: 40040266 PMC: 11901366. DOI: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2468109.


Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response.

Polanco M, Garate G, Sanchez-Gudin J, Madera J, Pascual J, Gonzalez-Quintanilla V J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004586 PMC: 11856491. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041054.


Review: An Update on CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for the Preventive Treatment of Episodic Migraine.

Nicol K, Burkett J Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025; 29(1):55.

PMID: 39998706 PMC: 11861264. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01365-4.