» Articles » PMID: 38774763

Life Goal Domains, Traits, and Setting Process in the Collaboration Between Healthcare Professionals and Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review

Overview
Date 2024 May 22
PMID 38774763
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: : This study aimed to describe the classification of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process as revealed by previous life goal-setting practices of healthcare professionals collaborating with cancer survivors.

Methods: : The design was a scoping review. The MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, and CINAHL databases were searched and mapped for papers with descriptions of goal domains, goal traits, and the goal-setting process. Goal domains were classified as life goals that were health-related, psychological, social, achievement-related, and leisure goals. Goal traits were classified based on specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timed (SMART) criteria. The goal-setting process was classified based on the frameworks of goal-setting phases (preparation, formulation, follow-up) and their components.

Results: : In total, 229 papers were identified, and 24 papers were included in the final analysis. All papers included health-related goals, followed by psychological and social goals. All goal domains were included in 41.7% of the papers. Relevant goals were the most common and timed goals were the least common. All papers included either of the components that comprise the preparation or formulation phases. We found that 12.5% of papers did not include any of the three components of the follow-up phase.

Conclusions: : The life goals collaboratively set between cancer survivors and healthcare professionals were characterized by the following: psychological and social goal domains, numerous goal domains, more relevant goals and fewer timed goals, low proportion of patient education in the preparation phase, and high proportion of evaluation of progress or achievement in the follow-up phase.

Citing Articles

Timing, setting, and content of patient education prior to goal setting for cancer survivors: a scoping review.

Ikeuchi K, Saito S, Kumura Y Support Care Cancer. 2024; 33(1):29.

PMID: 39672968 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09080-3.


Development of an Assessment Tool to Measure the Quality of Life Goal Setting for Cancer Survivors: A Content Validity Study.

Ikeuchi K, Nishida S, Karikawa M, Sakamoto C, Mori F, Tanaka M Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71272.

PMID: 39525132 PMC: 11550890. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71272.

References
1.
Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18(10):2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. View

2.
Friesen-Storms J, Bours G, Snijders I, van der Weijden T, Jie K, Beurskens A . A conversation approach based on shared goal-setting and shared decision-making for nurses in cancer aftercare: A developmental study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018; 35:107-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.06.002. View

3.
Lee J, Seo E, Choi J, Min J . Effects of patient participation in the management of daily nursing goals on function recovery and resilience in surgical patients. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27(13-14):2795-2803. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14302. View

4.
BovendEerdt T, Botell R, Wade D . Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23(4):352-61. DOI: 10.1177/0269215508101741. View

5.
Lindman A, Petersen A, Olesen G, Handberg C . Patients´ experiences and perspectives of challenges and needs related to nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation: Involving patients in developing a targeted rehabilitation programme. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 28(7-8):1260-1272. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14739. View