How Mandarin-English Bilinguals Interpret /: Impact of Language Proficiencies on Retrieval of Temporal Concepts

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 May 22

PMID 38774718

Authors

Tengji Yang

Ying Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mandarin and English are semantically equivalent in the domain of Space, but could be semantically opposite in the domain of Time. In other words, equivalent spatial lexical items could convey opposite temporal concepts. What temporal concepts conveyed by and would be retrieved by Mandarin-English (M-E) bilinguals with different language proficiencies? Drawing a sample from college students in Mainland China, this study examines how L1 and L2 proficiencies would affect M-E bilinguals' retrieval of temporal concepts by examining their interpretation of the Mandarin temporal metaphor of and the English temporal metaphors of . The results show that L1 temporal concepts would be retrieved more frequently than L2 temporal concepts regardless of the testing languages, that L1 and L2 proficiencies were not predictors for the way of interpretation, and that the higher L2 proficiency group could retrieve temporal concepts in line with the testing languages with higher accuracy than the lower L2 proficiency group. The findings suggest that bilinguals with higher L2 proficiency may be able to represent temporal concepts with language tags or may have an attentional and/or inhibitory control advantage.

References

Lai V, Boroditsky L . The immediate and chronic influence of spatio-temporal metaphors on the mental representations of time in english, mandarin, and mandarin-english speakers. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:142. PMC: 3621230. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00142. View

Nunez R, Sweetser E . With the future behind them: convergent evidence from aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cogn Sci. 2011; 30(3):401-50. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62. View

Ishihara M, Keller P, Rossetti Y, Prinz W . Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex. 2008; 44(4):454-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.010. View

Hilchey M, Klein R . Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 18(4):625-58. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7. View

Diamond J . Social science. The benefits of multilingualism. Science. 2010; 330(6002):332-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1195067. View

Boroditsky L . Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition. 2000; 75(1):1-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00073-6. View

Boroditsky L, Gaby A . Remembrances of times East: absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(11):1635-9. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610386621. View

Boroditsky L, Ramscar M . The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(2):185-9. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00434. View

Tao L, Wang G, Zhu M, Cai Q . Bilingualism and domain-general cognitive functions from a neural perspective: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 125:264-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.029. View

10.

Casasanto D, Boroditsky L . Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition. 2007; 106(2):579-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004. View

11.

Matzig S, Druks J, Masterson J, Vigliocco G . Noun and verb differences in picture naming: past studies and new evidence. Cortex. 2008; 45(6):738-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.003. View

12.

Ware A, Kirkovski M, Lum J . Meta-Analysis Reveals a Bilingual Advantage That Is Dependent on Task and Age. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1458. PMC: 7394008. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01458. View

13.

Xiao C, Zhao M, Chen L . Both Earlier Times and the Future Are "Front": The Distinction Between Time- and Ego-Reference-Points in Mandarin Speakers' Temporal Representation. Cogn Sci. 2017; 42(3):1026-1040. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12552. View

14.

Bialystok E, Craik F . How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(4):1246-1269. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5. View

15.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

16.

Shallice T, Burgess P . The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996; 351(1346):1405-11; discussion 1411-2. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0124. View

17.

Nunez R, Cooperrider K . The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(5):220-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008. View

18.

Duffy S, Feist M, McCarthy S . Moving through time: the role of personality in three real-life contexts. Cogn Sci. 2014; 38(8):1662-74. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12124. View

19.

Green D, Abutalebi J . Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2014; 25(5):515-530. PMC: 4095950. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.796377. View

20.

Fuhrman O, McCormick K, Chen E, Jiang H, Shu D, Mao S . How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cogn Sci. 2011; 35(7):1305-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x. View