» Articles » PMID: 38773986

Generalized Linear Models with Covariate Measurement Error and Zero-Inflated Surrogates

Overview
Date 2024 May 22
PMID 38773986
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidemiological studies often encounter a challenge due to exposure measurement error when estimating an exposure-disease association. A surrogate variable may be available for the true unobserved exposure variable. However, zero-inflated data are encountered frequently in the surrogate variables. For example, many nutrient or physical activity measures may have a zero value (or a low detectable value) among a group of individuals. In this paper, we investigate regression analysis when the observed surrogates may have zero values among some individuals of the whole study cohort. A naive regression calibration without taking into account a probability mass of the surrogate variable at 0 (or a low detectable value) will be biased. We developed a regression calibration estimator which typically can have smaller biases than the naive regression calibration estimator. We propose an expected estimating equation estimator which is consistent under the zero-inflated surrogate regression model. Extensive simulations show that the proposed estimator performs well in terms of bias correction. These methods are applied to a physical activity intervention study.

References
1.
Carroll R, Galindo C . Measurement error, biases, and the validation of complex models for blood lead levels in children. Environ Health Perspect. 1998; 106 Suppl 6:1535-9. PMC: 1533465. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61535. View

2.
Wang C, Cullings H, Song X, Kopecky K . Joint nonparametric correction estimator for excess relative risk regression in survival analysis with exposure measurement error. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2018; 79(5):1583-1599. PMC: 5773020. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12230. View

3.
Huang Y, Hwang W, Chen F . Differential measurement errors in zero-truncated regression models for count data. Biometrics. 2011; 67(4):1471-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01594.x. View

4.
Kipnis V, Subar A, Midthune D, Freedman L, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano R . Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg091. View

5.
Tooze J, Grunwald G, Jones R . Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002; 11(4):341-55. DOI: 10.1191/0962280202sm291ra. View