IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT Evaluation (The IMPART Study)

Overview

Journal Implement Sci Commun

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 May 22

PMID 38773632

Authors

Naomi Carlisle

Sonia Dalkin

Andrew H Shennan

Jane Sandall

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In the UK, 7.6% of babies are born preterm, which the Department of Health aims to decrease to 6% by 2025. To advance this, NHS England released Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 Element 5, recommending the Preterm Birth Pathway for women at risk of preterm birth. The success of this new pathway depends on its implementation. The IMPART (IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation) study aimed to research how, why, for whom, to what extent and in what contexts the prediction and prevention aspects of Preterm Birth Surveillance Pathway is implemented through a realist evaluation. Realist implementation studies are growing in popularity.

Methods: Initial programme theories were developed through a realist informed literature scope, interviews with developers of the NHS England guidance, and a national questionnaire of current practice. Implementation theory was utilised in developing the programme theories. Data (interviews and observations with staff and women) were undertaken in 3 case sites in England to 'test' the programme theories. Substantive theory was utilised during data analysis to interpret and refine the theories on how implementation could be improved.

Results: Three explanatory areas were developed: risk assessing and referral; the preterm birth surveillance clinic; and women centred care. Explanatory area 1 dealt with the problems in correct risk assessment and referral to a preterm clinic. Explanatory area 2 focused on how once a correct referral has been made to a preterm clinic, knowledgeable and supported clinicians can deliver a well-functioning clinic. Explanatory area 3 concentrated on how the pathway delivers appropriate care to women.

Conclusions: The IMPART study provides several areas where implementation could be improved. These include educating clinicians on knowledge of risk factors and the purpose of the preterm clinic, having a multidisciplinary preterm team (including a preterm midwife) with specialist preterm knowledge and skills (including transvaginal cervical scanning skills), and sites actively working with their local network. This multidisciplinary preterm team are placed to deliver continuity of care for women at high-risk of preterm birth, being attentive to their history but also ensuring they are not defined by their risk status.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN57127874.

Citing Articles

Correction: IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation (The IMPART Study).

Carlisle N, Dalkin S, Shennan A, Sandall J Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):133.

PMID: 39614392 PMC: 11607831. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00674-w.

References

McLeish J, Redshaw M . Peer support during pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study of models and perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:257. PMC: 4603913. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0685-y. View

Lilliecreutz C, Laren J, Sydsjo G, Josefsson A . Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on the risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16:5. PMC: 4714539. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0775-x. View

Donegan G, Noonan M, Bradshaw C . Parents experiences of pregnancy following perinatal loss: An integrative review. Midwifery. 2023; 121:103673. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103673. View

Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J . Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009; 91(3):219-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005. View

Kagan K, To M, Tsoi E, Nicolaides K . Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length. BJOG. 2007; 113 Suppl 3:52-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01124.x. View

Stahl K, Hundley V . Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy - do we scare because we care?. Midwifery. 2003; 19(4):298-309. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(03)00041-x. View

Chepulis L, Morison B, Tamatea J, Paul R, Wolmarans L, Martis R . Midwifery awareness of diabetes in pregnancy screening guidelines in Aotearoa New Zealand. Midwifery. 2022; 106:103230. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103230. View

Jakubowski B, Hinton L, Khaira J, Roberts N, McManus R, Tucker K . Is self-management a burden? What are the experiences of women self-managing chronic conditions during pregnancy? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3):e051962. PMC: 8935172. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051962. View

Hatmaker D, KEMP V . Perception of threat and subjective well-being in low-risk and high-risk pregnant women. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1998; 12(2):1-10. DOI: 10.1097/00005237-199809000-00002. View

10.

Gemine R, Davies G, Tarrant S, Davies R, James M, Lewis K . Factors associated with work-related burnout in NHS staff during COVID-19: a cross-sectional mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(1):e042591. PMC: 7844932. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042591. View

11.

Garcia-Flores V, Romero R, Furcron A, Levenson D, Galaz J, Zou C . Prenatal Maternal Stress Causes Preterm Birth and Affects Neonatal Adaptive Immunity in Mice. Front Immunol. 2020; 11:254. PMC: 7054386. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00254. View

12.

Miller L, Wanduru P, Wangia J, Calkins K, Spindler H, Butrick E . Simulation and team training to improve preterm birth knowledge, evidence-based practices, and communication skills in midwives in Kenya and Uganda: Findings from a pre- and post-intervention analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(6):e0001695. PMC: 10249881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001695. View

13.

Jordan R, Murphy P . Risk assessment and risk distortion: finding the balance. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009; 54(3):191-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.001. View

14.

Mills T, Ricklesford C, Cooke A, Heazell A, Whitworth M, Lavender T . Parents' experiences and expectations of care in pregnancy after stillbirth or neonatal death: a metasynthesis. BJOG. 2014; 121(8):943-50. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12656. View

15.

Patel R . Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants. Am J Perinatol. 2016; 33(3):318-28. PMC: 4760862. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1571202. View

16.

Iacobucci G . Covid-19: Staff absences are continuing to stretch NHS hospitals, say leaders. BMJ. 2022; 376:o350. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o350. View

17.

Brigante L, Coxon K, Fernandez Turienzo C, Sandall J . "She was there all the time". A qualitative study exploring how women at higher risk for preterm birth experience midwifery continuity of care. Women Birth. 2023; 36(4):e397-e404. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.01.003. View

18.

Tabak R, Khoong E, Chambers D, Brownson R . Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(3):337-50. PMC: 3592983. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024. View

19.

Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Eldh A, Cox K, Crichton N, Harvey G . A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):138. PMC: 6238283. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0. View

20.

Carlisle N, Dalkin S, Shennan A, Sandall J . Protocol for the IMPART study: IMplementation of the preterm birth surveillance PAthway - a RealisT evaluation. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3):e061302. PMC: 8966568. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061302. View