» Articles » PMID: 38770050

Complications of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Glaucoma: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 21
PMID 38770050
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This study was aimed to summarize the complications and their management associated with XEN gel stent implantation.

Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted using Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, from their inception to February 1, 2024.

Results: A total of 48 studies published between 2017 and 2024 were identified and included in the systematic review, including 16 original studies (retrospective or prospective clinical studies), 28 case reports, and 4 case series, which followed patients for up to 5 years. Early postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation include hypotony maculopathy (1.9-4.6%), occlusion (3.9-8.8%), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH), choroidal detachment (0-15%), conjunctival erosion, and exposure of the XEN gel stent (1.1-2.3%), wound and bleb leaks (2.1%) and malignant glaucoma (MG) (2.2%). Mid-postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation included migration of XEN (1.5%), ptosis (1.2%), endophthalmitis (0.4-3%), macular edema (1.5-4.3%), hypertrophic bleb (8.8%) and subconjunctival XEN gel stent fragmentation (reported in 2 cases). Late postoperative complications reported in cases included spontaneous dislocation and intraocular degradation.

Conclusion: XEN gel stent implantation is a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedure for glaucoma, known for its potential to minimize tissue damage and reduce surgical duration. However, it is crucial to note that despite these advantages, there remains a risk of severe complications, including endophthalmitis, SCH, and MG. Therefore, postoperative follow-up and early recognition of severe complications are essential for surgical management.

Citing Articles

Gels as Promising Delivery Systems: Physicochemical Property Characterization and Recent Applications.

Wang E, Qi Z, Cao Y, Li R, Wu J, Tang R Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006616 PMC: 11858892. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020249.


Update on Surgical Techniques Best Practices to Optimize Outcomes Following Gel Stent Implantation.

Vera V, Sheybani A, Panarelli J, Grover D, Lee J, Craven E Clin Ophthalmol. 2025; 19:325-347.

PMID: 39911142 PMC: 11794994. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S487718.

References
1.
Shirato S, Maruyama K, Haneda M . Resuturing the scleral flap through conjunctiva for treatment of excess filtration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(1):173-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.06.001. View

2.
Gillmann K, Bravetti G, Rao H, Mermoud A, Mansouri K . Combined and stand-alone XEN 45 gel stent implantation: 3-year outcomes and success predictors. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020; 99(4):e531-e539. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14605. View

3.
Pavicic-Astalos J, Ankamah E, Nolan J, Ng E, Garcia-Feijoo J . The Use of Fixation Suture to Treat Inferonasal Hypertrophic Bleb after Xen Gel Stent Implant: A Case Report. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2022; 13(1):253-258. PMC: 9082189. DOI: 10.1159/000523906. View

4.
De Gregorio A, Pedrotti E, Stevan G, Bertoncello A, Morselli S . XEN glaucoma treatment system in the management of refractory glaucomas: a short review on trial data and potential role in clinical practice. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018; 12:773-782. PMC: 5933334. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S146919. View

5.
Grover D, Flynn W, Bashford K, Lewis R, Duh Y, Nangia R . Performance and Safety of a New Ab Interno Gelatin Stent in Refractory Glaucoma at 12 Months. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 183:25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.023. View