Time, Valence, and Imagination: a Comparative Study of Thoughts in Restricted and Unrestricted Mind Wandering

Overview

Journal Psychol Res

Specialty Psychology

Date 2024 May 20

PMID 38767718

Authors

Halleyson Li

Thomas Hills

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

William James' "stream of thought" is a key component of human cognition. Such thoughts arise in both restricted and unrestricted contexts, either with or without the presence of a secondary task. This study examines the similarities and differences in thoughts produced in these two contexts, which we call restricted and unrestricted mind wandering. Participants performed a mindfulness task representing restricted mind wandering and an unrestricted thought task where they spontaneously explored thoughts, reporting them as they arose. Participants then self-rated their thoughts based on valence, temporal orientation (past/present/future), and reality orientation (imaginary vs. real). Participants' emotional states were also evaluated using the Emotion Recall Task (ERT) and the PANAS questionnaire. Unrestricted mind wandering generated more thoughts, which were more positive and future-oriented than those in restricted mind wandering. Additionally, participants' thought valence correlated with their PANAS and ERT scores. Approximately 1 out of 4 thoughts in both restricted and unrestricted mind wandering were imaginary, with increased future orientation linked to more imaginative thought. Despite the statistical differences separating restricted and unrestricted thought, effect sizes were predominantly small, indicating that the thoughts arise during these two types of mind wandering are largely of the same kind.

References

Arch J, Craske M . Mechanisms of mindfulness: emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction. Behav Res Ther. 2006; 44(12):1849-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.007. View

Baird B, Smallwood J, Schooler J . Back to the future: autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Conscious Cogn. 2011; 20(4):1604-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007. View

Belardi A, Chaieb L, Rey-Mermet A, Mormann F, Rothen N, Fell J . On the relationship between mind wandering and mindfulness. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):7755. PMC: 9095883. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11594-x. View

Berntsen D, Rubin D, Salgado S . The frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and future thoughts in relation to daydreaming, emotional distress, and age. Conscious Cogn. 2015; 36:352-72. PMC: 4552601. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.007. View

Blouin-Hudon E, Zelenski J . The daydreamer: Exploring the personality underpinnings of daydreaming styles and their implications for well-being. Conscious Cogn. 2016; 44:114-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.007. View

Buckner R, Andrews-Hanna J, Schacter D . The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1124:1-38. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1440.011. View

Callard F, Smallwood J, Golchert J, Margulies D . The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity. Front Psychol. 2014; 4:891. PMC: 3866909. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00891. View

Christoff K . Undirected thought: neural determinants and correlates. Brain Res. 2011; 1428:51-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.060. View

Christoff K, Irving Z, Fox K, Nathan Spreng R, Andrews-Hanna J . Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016; 17(11):718-731. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.113. View

10.

Chu M, Marks E, Smith C, Chadwick P . Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review. Conscious Cogn. 2023; 108:103463. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463. View

11.

Colzato L, de Bruijn E, Hommel B . Up to "me" or up to "us"? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:341. PMC: 3442283. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00341. View

12.

Girardeau J, Blonde P, Makowski D, Abram M, Piolino P, Sperduti M . The impact of state and dispositional mindfulness on prospective memory: A virtual reality study. Conscious Cogn. 2020; 81:102920. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102920. View

13.

Gonzalez-Castillo J, Kam J, Hoy C, Bandettini P . How to Interpret Resting-State fMRI: Ask Your Participants. J Neurosci. 2021; 41(6):1130-1141. PMC: 7888219. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1786-20.2020. View

14.

Holmes E, Blackwell S, Burnett Heyes S, Renner F, Raes F . Mental Imagery in Depression: Phenomenology, Potential Mechanisms, and Treatment Implications. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016; 12:249-80. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092925. View

15.

Jackson J, Balota D . Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for comprehension. Psychol Aging. 2011; 27(1):106-119. PMC: 3508668. DOI: 10.1037/a0023933. View

16.

Killingsworth M, Gilbert D . A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science. 2010; 330(6006):932. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192439. View

17.

Krans J, de Bree J, Moulds M . Involuntary cognitions in everyday life: exploration of type, quality, content, and function. Front Psychiatry. 2015; 6:7. PMC: 4313579. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00007. View

18.

Levinson D, Smallwood J, Davidson R . The persistence of thought: evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(4):375-80. PMC: 3328662. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611431465. View

19.

Li Y, Masitah A, Hills T . The Emotional Recall Task: Juxtaposing recall and recognition-based affect scales. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020; 46(9):1782-1794. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000841. View

20.

Marchetti I, Van de Putte E, Koster E . Self-generated thoughts and depression: from daydreaming to depressive symptoms. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:131. PMC: 3957030. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00131. View