» Articles » PMID: 38765246

Engineering Antibacterial Bioceramics: Design Principles and Mechanisms of Action

Overview
Journal Mater Today Bio
Date 2024 May 20
PMID 38765246
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The urgency to address skeletal abnormalities and diseases through innovative approaches has led to a significant interdisciplinary convergence of engineering, 3D printing, and design in developing individualised bioceramic bioscaffolds. This review explores into the recent advancements and future trajectory of non-antibiotic antibacterial bioceramics in bone tissue engineering, an importance given the escalating challenges of orthopaedic infections, antibiotic resistance, and emergent pathogens. Initially, the review provides an in-depth exploration of the complex interactions among bacteria, immune cells, and bioceramics in clinical contexts, highlighting the multifaceted nature of infection dynamics, including protein adsorption, immunological responses, bacterial adherence, and endotoxin release. Then, focus on the next-generation bioceramics designed to offer multifunctionality, especially in delivering antibacterial properties independent of traditional antibiotics. A key highlight of this study is the exploration of smart antibacterial bioceramics, marking a revolutionary stride in medical implant technology. The review also aims to guide the ongoing development and clinical adoption of bioceramic materials, focusing on their dual capabilities in promoting bone regeneration and exhibiting antibacterial properties. These next-generation bioceramics represent a paradigm shift in medical implant technology, offering multifunctional benefits that transcend traditional approaches.

Citing Articles

ZnSnO@SiO@5-FU Nanoparticles as an Additive for Maxillary Bone Defects.

Rehner Costache A, Bratu A, Birca A, Niculescu A, Holban A, Hudita A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39796051 PMC: 11720676. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010194.


Development of Novel Antibacterial Ti-Nb-Ga Alloys with Low Stiffness for Medical Implant Applications.

McHendrie R, Nguyen N, Nguyen M, Fallahnezhad K, Vasilev K, Truong V J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38921540 PMC: 11204729. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15060167.

References
1.
Barrak F, Li S, Mohammed A, Myant C, Jones J . Anti-inflammatory properties of S53P4 bioactive glass implant material. J Dent. 2022; 127:104296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104296. View

2.
Mas-Moruno C, Su B, Dalby M . Multifunctional Coatings and Nanotopographies: Toward Cell Instructive and Antibacterial Implants. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018; 8(1):e1801103. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201801103. View

3.
Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski K, Exterkate R, Kleverlaan C, Valandro L . Grinding With Diamond Burs and Hydrothermal Aging of a Y-TZP Material: Effect on the Material Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion. Oper Dent. 2017; 42(6):669-678. DOI: 10.2341/16-108-L. View

4.
Bieganski P, Szczupak L, Arruebo M, Kowalski K . Brief survey on organometalated antibacterial drugs and metal-based materials with antibacterial activity. RSC Chem Biol. 2021; 2(2):368-386. PMC: 8341851. DOI: 10.1039/d0cb00218f. View

5.
Pelepenko L, Saavedra F, Antunes T, Bombarda G, Gomes B, Zaia A . Physicochemical, antimicrobial, and biological properties of White-MTAFlow. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(2):663-672. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03543-7. View