» Articles » PMID: 38763959

Systematic In-silico Evaluation of Fibrosis Effects on Re-entrant Wave Dynamics in Atrial Tissue

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 19
PMID 38763959
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the key role of fibrosis in atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of different spatial distributions and textures of fibrosis on wave propagation mechanisms in AF are not fully understood. To clarify these aspects, we performed a systematic computational study to assess fibrosis effects on the characteristics and stability of re-entrant waves in electrically-remodelled atrial tissues. A stochastic algorithm, which generated fibrotic distributions with controlled overall amount, average size, and orientation of fibrosis elements, was implemented on a monolayer spheric atrial model. 245 simulations were run at changing fibrosis parameters. The emerging propagation patterns were quantified in terms of rate, regularity, and coupling by frequency-domain analysis of correspondent synthetic bipolar electrograms. At the increase of fibrosis amount, the rate of reentrant waves significantly decreased and higher levels of regularity and coupling were observed (p < 0.0001). Higher spatial variability and pattern stochasticity over repetitions was observed for larger amount of fibrosis, especially in the presence of patchy and compact fibrosis. Overall, propagation slowing and organization led to higher stability of re-entrant waves. These results strengthen the evidence that the amount and spatial distribution of fibrosis concur in dictating re-entry dynamics in remodeled tissue and represent key factors in AF maintenance.

References
1.
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C . 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the.... Eur Heart J. 2020; 42(5):373-498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. View

2.
Jones N, Hobbs F, Taylor C . Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: where we are and where we should be. Br J Gen Pract. 2018; 68(671):260-261. PMC: 6001982. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X696257. View

3.
Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, Goette A . Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91(1):265-325. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2009. View

4.
Lau D, Linz D, Schotten U, Mahajan R, Sanders P, Kalman J . Pathophysiology of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Rotors, Foci and Fibrosis. Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 26(9):887-893. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.119. View

5.
Mase M, Marini M, Disertori M, Ravelli F . Dynamics of AV coupling during human atrial fibrillation: role of atrial rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015; 309(1):H198-205. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00726.2014. View