» Articles » PMID: 38762215

A Comparison of Quality-adjusted Life Years in Older Adults After Heart Transplantation Versus Long-term Mechanical Support: Findings from the SUSTAIN-IT Study

Abstract

Background: The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) measures disease burden and treatment, combining overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We estimated QALYs in 3 groups of older patients (60-80 years) with heart failure (HF) who underwent heart transplantation (HT, with pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support [HT MCS] or HT without pre-transplant MCS [HT Non-MCS]) or long-term MCS (destination therapy). We also identified factors associated with gains in QALYs through 24 months follow-up.

Methods: Of 393 eligible patients enrolled (10/1/15-12/31/18) at 13 U.S. sites, 161 underwent HT (n = 68 HT MCS, n = 93 HT Non-MCS) and 144 underwent long-term MCS. Survival and HRQOL data were collected through 24 months. QALY health utilities were based on patient self-report of EQ-5D-3L dimensions. Mean-restricted QALYs were compared among groups using generalized linear models.

Results: For the entire cohort, mean age in years closest to surgery was 67 (standard deviation, SD: 4.7), 78% were male, and 83% were White. By 18 months post-surgery, sustained significant differences in adjusted average ± SD QALYs emerged across groups, with the HT Non-MCS group having the highest average QALYs (24-month window: HT Non-MCS = 22.58 ± 1.1, HT MCS = 19.53 ± 1.33, Long-term MCS = 19.49 ± 1.3, p = 0.003). At 24 months post-operatively, a lower gain in QALYs was associated with HT MCS, long-term MCS, a lower pre-operative LVEF, NYHA class III or IV before surgery, and an ischemic or other etiology of HF.

Conclusions: Determination of QALYs may provide important information for policy makers and clinicians to consider regarding benefits of HT and long-term MCS as treatment options for older patients with HF.

References
1.
Andrei A, Murray S . Regression models for the mean of the quality-of-life-adjusted restricted survival time using pseudo-observations. Biometrics. 2007; 63(2):398-404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00723.x. View

2.
Torrance G, Feeny D . Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989; 5(4):559-75. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300008461. View

3.
Neyt M, Van den Bruel A, Smit Y, de Jonge N, Vlayen J . The cost-utility of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal of economic evaluations. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 3(5):439-49. PMC: 4229461. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.02. View

4.
Grady K, Andrei A, Elenbaas C, Warzecha A, Baldridge A, Kao A . Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(4):e024385. PMC: 9245796. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024385. View

5.
Cho S, Moazami N, Frontera J . Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage in HeartMate II and HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care. 2017; 27(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0386-7. View