» Articles » PMID: 38760647

Does Delayed Phase Imaging in CT Angiography Provide Additional Information in Patients with Suspected Active Bleeding?

Overview
Journal Emerg Radiol
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38760647
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We hypothesize that delayed phase imaging does not provide additional diagnostic information in patients who undergo multi-phasic CTA for suspected active bleeding.

Methods: Data on patients who underwent multiphasic CTA (pre-contrast, arterial, porto-venous, and delayed phases) for suspected acute bleed were retrospectively collected between January 2019 and November 2021. CTA images were reviewed by a general radiologist, an interventional radiologist, and a body imaging radiologist independently. Each reader evaluated if delayed phase images provided additional information that would change the final impression of the CTA report. Additional information regarding bleeding location, time needed for delayed image acquisition, and radiation exposure were also obtained.

Results: A total of 104 patients with CTAs were analyzed with an average age of 58 years ± 22. Studies rated with absent additional findings on delayed images were 102 (98.1%) by the interventional radiologist, 101 (97.1%) by the body imaging radiologist, and 100 (96.1%) by the general radiologist with percent agreement of 96.15% (kappa 0.54, p < 0.001). All the findings were characterized as unlikely to be clinically significant. Mean time added to complete a delayed phase images was 3.61 ± 3.4 min. The average CT dose length product (DLP) for the total exam was 3621.78 ± 2129.57 mGy.cm with delayed acquisition adding a mean DLP of 847.75 ± 508.8 mGy.cm.

Conclusion: Delayed phase imaging does not provide significant additional diagnostic information in evaluating patients with suspected active bleeding but is associated with increased examination time and radiation exposure.

References
1.
Novelline R, Rhea J, Rao P, Stuk J . Helical CT in emergency radiology. Radiology. 1999; 213(2):321-39. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv01321. View

2.
Shuman W . CT of blunt abdominal trauma in adults. Radiology. 1997; 205(2):297-306. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356606. View

3.
Novelline R, Rhea J, Bell T . Helical CT of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999; 37(3):591-612, vi-vii. DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70113-5. View

4.
Boscak A, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis S, Fleiter T, Miller L, Sliker C . Optimizing trauma multidetector CT protocol for blunt splenic injury: need for arterial and portal venous phase scans. Radiology. 2013; 268(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121370. View

5.
Hagiwara A, Yukioka T, Ohta S, Nitatori T, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S . Nonsurgical management of patients with blunt splenic injury: efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167(1):159-66. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659363. View