» Articles » PMID: 38760045

Process Evaluation of a Structured E-parenting Support (STEPS) in the OPTIMA Randomised Controlled Trial: a Protocol

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38760045
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: (STEPS) is a digital application (app) designed to help parents manage behaviour of their children who are referred to mental health services and are waiting for an assessment or treatment. STEPS is currently being evaluated in the Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder randomised controlled trial. Alongside the examination of STEPS' clinical and cost-effectiveness, we are conducting a process evaluation to better understand the contextual factors that may influence study outcomes. The purpose of this protocol is to describe the aims, objectives and methodology of the process evaluation prior to it taking place to add to the fidelity and rigour of the trial process and outcomes. Our goal is to adapt STEPS to optimise its benefits in future applications.

Methods: In line with the Medical Research Council guidelines for evaluating complex interventions, the process evaluation will adopt a mixed method design using qualitative data collected from clinicians and parent interviews and app usage data from participants assigned to the intervention arm.

Analysis: Qualitative data from semistructured interviews and free text box responses included in trial questionnaires will be analysed thematically using framework analysis to better understand how parents use STEPS, how it works and key factors that could aid or hinder its effective implementation in routine clinical practice.

Ethics: The application for ethical approval for the study was submitted to the North West-Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee and received a favourable opinion on further information on 26 November 2021, reference number 21/NW/0319.

Dissemination: The process evaluation aims to explore how a digital app might support parents in managing their child's behaviour. Implications for policy and research will be explored and the clinical implications of offering the app to a wider audience to address the lack of support to parents as highlighted in this paper. We plan to publish findings in international, peer-reviewed journals as well as present at conferences.

Trial Registration Number: The trial has been prospectively registered on 18 November 2021; ISRCTN816523503. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16523503.

References
1.
Barrett B, Byford S, Sharac J, Hudry K, Leadbitter K, Temple K . Service and wider societal costs of very young children with autism in the UK. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011; 42(5):797-804. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-011-1306-x. View

2.
Murray E, Hekler E, Andersson G, Collins L, Doherty A, Hollis C . Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(5):843-851. PMC: 5324832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008. View

3.
Daley D, Van der Oord S, Ferrin M, Danckaerts M, Doepfner M, Cortese S . Behavioral interventions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across multiple outcome domains. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014; 53(8):835-47, 847.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.05.013. View

4.
Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

5.
Swanson J, Kraemer H, Hinshaw S, Arnold L, Conners C, Abikoff H . Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001; 40(2):168-79. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200102000-00011. View