» Articles » PMID: 38759902

Role of Amelogenin Phosphorylation in Regulating Dental Enamel Formation

Overview
Journal Matrix Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38759902
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Amelogenin (AMELX), the predominant matrix protein in enamel formation, contains a singular phosphorylation site at Serine 16 (S16) that greatly enhances AMELX's capacity to stabilize amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) and inhibit its transformation to apatitic enamel crystals. To explore the potential role of AMELX phosphorylation in vivo, we developed a knock-in (KI) mouse model in which AMELX phosphorylation is prevented by substituting S16 with Ala (A). As anticipated, AMELX KI mice displayed a severe phenotype characterized by weak hypoplastic enamel, absence of enamel rods, extensive ectopic calcifications, a greater rate of ACP transformation to apatitic crystals, and progressive cell pathology in enamel-forming cells (ameloblasts). In the present investigation, our focus was on understanding the mechanisms of action of phosphorylated AMELX in amelogenesis. We have hypothesized that the absence of AMELX phosphorylation would result in a loss of controlled mineralization during the secretory stage of amelogenesis, leading to an enhanced rate of enamel mineralization that causes enamel acidification due to excessive proton release. To test these hypotheses, we employed microcomputed tomography (µCT), colorimetric pH assessment, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy of apical portions of mandibular incisors from 8-week old wildtype (WT) and KI mice. As hypothesized, µCT analyses demonstrated significantly higher rates of enamel mineral densification in KI mice during the secretory stage compared to the WT. Despite a greater rate of enamel densification, maximal KI enamel thickness increased at a significantly lower rate than that of the WT during the secretory stage of amelogenesis, reaching a thickness in mid-maturation that is approximately half that of the WT. pH assessments revealed a lower pH in secretory enamel in KI compared to WT mice, as hypothesized. FTIR findings further demonstrated that KI enamel is comprised of significantly greater amounts of acid phosphate compared to the WT, consistent with our pH assessments. Furthermore, FTIR microspectroscopy indicated a significantly higher mineral-to-organic ratio in KI enamel, as supported by µCT findings. Collectively, our current findings demonstrate that phosphorylated AMELX plays crucial mechanistic roles in regulating the rate of enamel mineral formation, and in maintaining physico-chemical homeostasis and the enamel growth pattern during early stages of amelogenesis.

Citing Articles

Subcutaneous implantation of tooth germ stem cells over the masseter muscle in mice: An in vivo pilot study.

Nourbakhsh N, Baniebrahimi G, Talebi S, Talebi A, Nasr Esfahani M, Movahedian B Regen Ther. 2025; 28:536-543.

PMID: 40027990 PMC: 11869380. DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.01.021.

References
1.
Bronckers A, Lyaruu D, Jalali R, DenBesten P . Buffering of protons released by mineral formation during amelogenesis in mice. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124(5):415-425. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12287. View

2.
Smith C, Issid M, Margolis H, Moreno E . Developmental changes in the pH of enamel fluid and its effects on matrix-resident proteinases. Adv Dent Res. 1996; 10(2):159-69. DOI: 10.1177/08959374960100020701. View

3.
Daculsi G, Menanteau J, Kerebel L, Mitre D . Length and shape of enamel crystals. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36(5):550-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02405364. View

4.
Simmer J, Hu J, Hu Y, Zhang S, Liang T, Wang S . A genetic model for the secretory stage of dental enamel formation. J Struct Biol. 2021; 213(4):107805. PMC: 8665125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107805. View

5.
Hu J, Chun Y, Al Hazzazzi T, Simmer J . Enamel formation and amelogenesis imperfecta. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007; 186(1):78-85. DOI: 10.1159/000102683. View