» Articles » PMID: 38758909

Function of NEK2 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Effect on the Tumor Microenvironment

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38758909
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies have revealed the critical functions of NEK2 in controlling the cell cycle which is linked to poor prognosis in multiple tumor types, but less research has been devoted to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods: We downloaded clinical data from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) and TCGA databases together with transcriptional and mutational datasets. Strongly coexpressed genes with NEK2 were extracted from TCGA-KIRC cohort, and were submitted to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) for functional analyses. According to NEK2 levels, the survival status, mutational characteristics, response to immunotherapy and sensitivity to drugs of the patients were studied. The potential correlations between NEK2 levels and immune cell state as well as immune cell infiltration were examined using the GEPIA, TIMER and TISIDB databases. Double immunofluorescence (IF) was performed to identify the NEK2 overexpression and relationship with CD8 in ccRCC.

Results: The NEK2 gene was overexpressed and would enhance the nuclear division and cell cycle activities in ccRCC. ccRCC patients with high NEK2 expression had worse clinical outcomes, higher mutation burden and better therapeutic response. Moreover, NEK2 gene overexpression was positively related to various immune cell marker sets, which was also proved by validation cohort, and more infiltration of various immune cells.

Conclusion: ccRCC patients with NEK2 high expression have a poorer prognosis than those with NEK2 low expression, resulting from its function of promoting proliferation, accompanied by increased infiltration of CD8 + T cells and Tregs and T-cell exhaustion and will respond better to proper treatments.

Citing Articles

Role of NEK2 in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.

Xia J, Zhao H, Edmondson J, Koss B, Zhan F Trends Mol Med. 2024; 31(1):79-93.

PMID: 39181803 PMC: 11717647. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.07.013.

References
1.
De Marco S, Torsello B, Minutiello E, Morabito I, Grasselli C, Bombelli S . The cross-talk between Abl2 tyrosine kinase and TGFβ1 signalling modulates the invasion of clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma cells. FEBS Lett. 2022; 597(8):1098-1113. DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14531. View

2.
Mayakonda A, Lin D, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler H . Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018; 28(11):1747-1756. PMC: 6211645. DOI: 10.1101/gr.239244.118. View

3.
Kim I, McCutcheon J, Rao G, Liu S, Pommier Y, Skrzypski M . Acquired SETD2 mutation and impaired CREB1 activation confer cisplatin resistance in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2018; 38(2):180-193. PMC: 8274951. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0429-3. View

4.
Gonzalez-Rodriguez P, Engskog-Vlachos P, Zhang H, Murgoci A, Zerdes I, Joseph B . SETD2 mutation in renal clear cell carcinoma suppress autophagy via regulation of ATG12. Cell Death Dis. 2020; 11(1):69. PMC: 6985262. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-2266-x. View

5.
Lu M, Zhao B, Liu M, Wu L, Li Y, Zhai Y . Pan-cancer analysis of SETD2 mutation and its association with the efficacy of immunotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2021; 5(1):51. PMC: 8203790. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00193-0. View