» Articles » PMID: 38755796

Enhanced Luminance Sensitivity on Color and Luminance Pedestals: Threshold Measurements and a Model of Parvocellular Luminance Processing

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38755796
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychophysical interactions between chromatic and achromatic stimuli may inform our understanding of the cortical processing of signals of parvocellular origin, which carry both luminance and color information. We measured observers' sensitivity in discriminating the luminance of circular patch stimuli with a range of baseline ("pedestal") luminance and chromaticity. Pedestal stimuli were defined along vectors in cone-contrast space in a plane spanned by the red-green cone-opponent (L-M) and achromatic (L + M + S) axes. For a range of pedestal directions and intensities within this plane, we measured thresholds for discriminating increments from decrements along the achromatic axis. Low-contrast pedestals lowered luminance thresholds for every pedestal type. Thresholds began to increase with higher pedestal contrasts, forming a "dipper"-shaped function. Dipper functions varied systematically with pedestal chromaticity: Compared to the achromatic case, chromatic pedestals were effective at lower contrast. We suggest that the enhancement of luminance sensitivity caused by both achromatic and chromatic pedestals stems from a single mechanism, which is maximally sensitive to chromatic stimuli. We fit our data with a computational model of such a mechanism, in which luminance is computed from the rectified output of cone-opponent mechanisms similar to parvocellular neurons.

Citing Articles

Visual Neurophysiological Biomarkers for Patient Stratification and Treatment Development Across Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Martinez A, Hillyard S, Javitt D Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:757-799.

PMID: 39562463 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_25.


Binocular integration of chromatic and luminance signals.

Baker D, Hansford K, Segala F, Morsi A, Huxley R, Martin J J Vis. 2024; 24(12):7.

PMID: 39499524 PMC: 11556357. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.12.7.


Varying test-pattern duration to explore the dynamics of contrast-comparison and contrast-normalization processes.

Graham N, Wolfson S J Vis. 2023; 23(1):15.

PMID: 36689217 PMC: 9896861. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.15.


Detection and discrimination of achromatic contrast: A ganglion cell perspective.

Lee B, Swanson W J Vis. 2022; 22(8):11.

PMID: 35848903 PMC: 9308016. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.8.11.


Linking perceived to physical contrast: Comparing results from discrimination and difference-scaling experiments.

Shooner C, Mullen K J Vis. 2022; 22(1):13.

PMID: 35061001 PMC: 8787651. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.1.13.

References
1.
Petrova D, Henning G, Stockman A . The temporal characteristics of the early and late stages of L- and M-cone pathways that signal brightness. J Vis. 2013; 13(7):15. DOI: 10.1167/13.7.15. View

2.
Meese T, Summers R . Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1627):2891-900. PMC: 2211515. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0957. View

3.
Johnson E, Hawken M, Shapley R . The spatial transformation of color in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(4):409-16. DOI: 10.1038/86061. View

4.
Legge G, Kersten D . Light and dark bars; contrast discrimination. Vision Res. 1983; 23(5):473-83. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90122-0. View

5.
Lennie P, DZmura M . Mechanisms of color vision. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1988; 3(4):333-400. View