» Articles » PMID: 38754097

MUSE-XAE: MUtational Signature Extraction with EXplainable AutoEncoder Enhances Tumour Types Classification

Overview
Journal Bioinformatics
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 May 16
PMID 38754097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Motivation: Mutational signatures are a critical component in deciphering the genetic alterations that underlie cancer development and have become a valuable resource to understand the genomic changes during tumorigenesis. Therefore, it is essential to employ precise and accurate methods for their extraction to ensure that the underlying patterns are reliably identified and can be effectively utilized in new strategies for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer patients.

Results: We present MUSE-XAE, a novel method for mutational signature extraction from cancer genomes using an explainable autoencoder. Our approach employs a hybrid architecture consisting of a nonlinear encoder that can capture nonlinear interactions among features, and a linear decoder which ensures the interpretability of the active signatures. We evaluated and compared MUSE-XAE with other available tools on both synthetic and real cancer datasets and demonstrated that it achieves superior performance in terms of precision and sensitivity in recovering mutational signature profiles. MUSE-XAE extracts highly discriminative mutational signature profiles by enhancing the classification of primary tumour types and subtypes in real world settings. This approach could facilitate further research in this area, with neural networks playing a critical role in advancing our understanding of cancer genomics.

Availability And Implementation: MUSE-XAE software is freely available at https://github.com/compbiomed-unito/MUSE-XAE.

References
1.
Tate J, Bamford S, Jubb H, Sondka Z, Beare D, Bindal N . COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D941-D947. PMC: 6323903. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1015. View

2.
Secrier M, Li X, de Silva N, Eldridge M, Contino G, Bornschein J . Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(10):1131-41. PMC: 5957269. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3659. View

3.
Degasperi A, Amarante T, Czarnecki J, Shooter S, Zou X, Glodzik D . A practical framework and online tool for mutational signature analyses show inter-tissue variation and driver dependencies. Nat Cancer. 2020; 1(2):249-263. PMC: 7048622. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0027-5. View

4.
Wojtowicz D, Hoinka J, Amgalan B, Kim Y, Przytycka T . RepairSig: Deconvolution of DNA damage and repair contributions to the mutational landscape of cancer. Cell Syst. 2021; 12(10):994-1003.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.07.004. View

5.
Islam S, Diaz-Gay M, Wu Y, Barnes M, Vangara R, Bergstrom E . Uncovering novel mutational signatures by extraction with SigProfilerExtractor. Cell Genom. 2022; 2(11):None. PMC: 9646490. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100179. View