» Articles » PMID: 38752988

Disparities in Mammography Screening: Analyzing Barriers to Access Using Individual Patient Perspectives and the Health Belief Model

Overview
Journal Cancer Control
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 May 16
PMID 38752988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study is to explore Nepali women's beliefs about access to mammography screening, and motivations to get screened or not. This work was intended to be hypothesis generating for subsequent quantitative analysis and to inform policy and decision-making to improve access.

Methods: We conducted structured qualitative interviews among nine Nepali women in the Northeast of the United States receiving care at a local community health center and among nine white women receiving mammography care at a large academic medical center in the Northeast. We analyzed the transcripts using a mixed deductive (content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach. Deductive codes were generated from the Health Belief Model which states that a person's belief in the real threat of a disease with their belief in the effectiveness of the recommended health service or behavior or action will predict the likelihood the person will adopt the behavior. We compared and contrasted qualitative results from both groups.

Results: We found that eligible Nepali women who had not received mammography screening had no knowledge of its availability and its importance. Primary care physicians emerged as a critical link in addressing this disparity: trust was found to be high among Nepali women with their established primary care provider.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the role of primary care practitioners in conversations around the importance and eligibility for mammography screening is of critical importance, especially for underserved groups with limited health knowledge of screening opportunities and potential health benefits. Follow-up research should focus on primary care practices.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Bolton K, Mace J, Vacek P, Herschorn S, James T, Tice J . Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(8). PMC: 4375382. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju157. View

3.
Harada-Shoji N, Suzuki A, Ishida T, Zheng Y, Narikawa-Shiono Y, Sato-Tadano A . Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(8):e2121505. PMC: 8374606. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21505. View

4.
Bleyer A, Welch H . Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(21):1998-2005. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809. View

5.
Funaro K, Niell B . Screening Mammography Utilization in the United States. J Breast Imaging. 2024; 5(4):384-392. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad042. View