» Articles » PMID: 38751587

Application of Empathy Theory in the Study of the Effectiveness and Timeliness of Information Dissemination in Regional Public Health Events

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 May 16
PMID 38751587
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the role of empathy theory in enhancing the effectiveness and timeliness of information dissemination during regional public health events, with a focus on the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics as case studies. Utilizing an anthropological interview method, the research delves into the public's transformation from passive recipients to active participants in information dissemination, emphasizing the impact of empathy.

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the application of empathy theory in the context of public health emergencies and to determine its influence on the quality of information dissemination and public engagement.

Methods: The research involved two distinct surveys, each collecting 50 questionnaires from participants in different regions, to capture a diverse range of perspectives. The surveys assessed participants' views on information dissemination, their levels of empathy, and their behaviors in receiving and sharing health-related information.

Results: The findings indicate that empathy plays a crucial role in facilitating the active involvement of the public in information dissemination. There is a notable difference in the public's emotional response and information sharing behaviors between regions with direct experience of the health events and those less affected.

Conclusion: The study concludes that empathy theory, when applied to information dissemination during public health emergencies, can significantly improve the public's engagement and the overall effectiveness of communication strategies. The results underscore the need for empathetic communication to foster a sense of solidarity and collective action in response to public health crises.

References
1.
Mello M, Fusaro M, Aglioti S . The neuroscience of human empathy for pleasure: protocol for a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):82. PMC: 10908019. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02481-9. View

2.
Saunders-Hastings P, Krewski D . Reviewing the History of Pandemic Influenza: Understanding Patterns of Emergence and Transmission. Pathogens. 2016; 5(4). PMC: 5198166. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens5040066. View

3.
Samarasekera D, Lee S, Yeo J, Yeo S, Ponnamperuma G . Empathy in health professions education: What works, gaps and areas for improvement. Med Educ. 2022; 57(1):86-101. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14865. View

4.
Kim S, Pinkerton T, Ganesh N . Assessment of H1N1 questions and answers posted on the Web. Am J Infect Control. 2011; 40(3):211-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.028. View

5.
Flykt A, Dewari A, Fallhagen M, Molin A, Odda A, Ring J . Emotion recognition accuracy only weakly predicts empathic accuracy in a standard paradigm and in real life interactions. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1154236. PMC: 10232734. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154236. View