» Articles » PMID: 38748290

Clinical Value of Semi-quantitative Parameters in Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Treatment and Diagnostics of Cranial Meningioma in a Single-center Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Rep
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2024 May 15
PMID 38748290
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The value of somatostatin-analogon PET tracers in theranostics in cranial meningioma has been demonstrated in several studies; however, the value of semi-quantitative parameters for therapy and patient outcome is still unclear.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed comparing measured semi-quantitative Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value = SUVmax, mean standardized uptake value = SUVmean, and metabolic tumor volume = MTV) and calculated ratios (SUVmax tumor to pituitary gland and SUVmax tumor to superior sinus sagittalis), versus the WHO grades and overall outcome. Patients with histological confirmed meningioma or high probability for meningioma in the previous cranial MRI were eligible.

Results: Thirty-two patients from January 2018 to February 2023 were retrospectively included. The WHO grade I meningioma was confirmed in 17 patients, the WHO grade II in five patients, and the WHO grade III in two patients, while in eight patients, diagnosis was solely based on MRI and Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT findings. In 12 cases, stable disease was present, in 15 cases, radiation therapy was chosen, in three cases, neurosurgery was preferred, while in two cases, palliative care was chosen. Median SUVmax values increased with the WHO grade (15.84, 17.22, and 28.4, p = 0.134, Kruskal-Wallis test), and no statistically significant difference was present for MTV, SUVmax, and calculated ratios.

Conclusion: Increased SUVmax values in the tumor in Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT are associated with higher WHO grade, although further studies including larger patient collectives are needed to solidify this hypothesis.

References
1.
Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson M, Sahm F, Mawrin C, Weber D . EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23(11):1821-1834. PMC: 8563316. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150. View

2.
Filippi L, Palumbo I, Bagni O, Schillaci O, Aristei C, Palumbo B . Somatostatin Receptor Targeted PET-Imaging for Diagnosis, Radiotherapy Planning and Theranostics of Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(7). PMC: 9321668. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071666. View

3.
Marosi C, Hassler M, Roessler K, Reni M, Sant M, Mazza E . Meningioma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008; 67(2):153-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.010. View

4.
Hope T, Allen-Auerbach M, Bodei L, Calais J, Dahlbom M, Dunnwald L . SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med. 2023; 64(2):204-210. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264860. View

5.
Kriwanek F, Ulbrich L, Lechner W, Lutgendorf-Caucig C, Konrad S, Waldstein C . Impact of SSTR PET on Inter-Observer Variability of Target Delineation of Meningioma and the Possibility of Using Threshold-Based Segmentations in Radiation Oncology. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(18). PMC: 9497299. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184435. View