Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Post-hospital Follow-up Care to Improve Physical Recovery for Intensive Care Survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

Overview

Journal Int J Nurs Stud Adv

Specialty Nursing

Date 2024 May 15

PMID 38746570

Authors

Nicola M A Rea

Lis Neubeck

Kalliopi Kydonaki

Sheona Mchale

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.

Objective: To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors' experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care.

Settings: A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process.

Participants: The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).

Methods: Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.

Results: From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).

Conclusions: For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in information provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients' self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.

Registration: PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42022355711.

Tweetable Abstract: Patients' experiences of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research.

Citing Articles

Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with AKI: A Systematic Review.

Natale P, Wu R, Hughes A, Sluiter A, Rubenstein D, Zappitelli M Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025; 20(3):326-336.

PMID: 39921497 PMC: 11906012. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000605.

References

Bench S, Cornish J, Xyrichis A . Intensive care discharge summaries for general practice staff: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(653):e904-e912. PMC: 5198666. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X688045. View

Jones C . Recovery post ICU. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014; 30(5):239-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.06.001. View

Kean S, Donaghy E, Bancroft A, Clegg G, Rodgers S . Theorising survivorship after intensive care: A systematic review of patient and family experiences. J Clin Nurs. 2021; 30(17-18):2584-2610. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15766. View

Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R . Post-intensive Care Syndrome: an Overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017; 5(2):90-92. PMC: 5506407. DOI: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0016. View

Sjoberg F, Orwelius L, Berg S . Health-related quality of life after critical care-the emperor's new clothes. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):308. PMC: 7276949. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03012-3. View

Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K . Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):179-87. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062. View

Maddox M, Dunn S, Pretty L . Psychosocial recovery following ICU: experiences and influences upon discharge to the community. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2001; 17(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1054/iccn.2000.1536. View

Auriemma C, ODonnell H, Jones J, Barbati Z, Akpek E, Klaiman T . Patient perspectives on states worse than death: A qualitative study with implications for patient-centered outcomes and values elicitation. Palliat Med. 2021; 36(2):348-357. PMC: 9813946. DOI: 10.1177/02692163211058596. View

Connolly B . Describing and measuring recovery and rehabilitation after critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015; 21(5):445-52. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000233. View

10.

Davidson J, Jones C, Bienvenu O . Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2011; 40(2):618-24. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9. View

11.

Orwelius L, Nordlund A, Nordlund P, Simonsson E, Backman C, Samuelsson A . Pre-existing disease: the most important factor for health related quality of life long-term after critical illness: a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre trial. Crit Care. 2010; 14(2):R67. PMC: 2887189. DOI: 10.1186/cc8967. View

12.

Akinosoglou K, Schinas G, Almyroudi M, Gogos C, Dimopoulos G . The impact of age on intensive care. Ageing Res Rev. 2022; 84:101832. PMC: 9769029. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101832. View

13.

Griffith D, Salisbury L, Lee R, Lone N, Merriweather J, Walsh T . Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life After ICU: Importance of Patient Demographics, Previous Comorbidity, and Severity of Illness. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46(4):594-601. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002952. View

14.

Tong A, Flemming K, Mcinnes E, Oliver S, Craig J . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:181. PMC: 3552766. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. View

15.

Hanifa A, Glaeemose A, Laursen B . Picking up the pieces: Qualitative evaluation of follow-up consultations post intensive care admission. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018; 48:85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.06.004. View

16.

McPeake J, Quasim T, Henderson P, Leyland A, Lone N, Walters M . Multimorbidity and Its Relationship With Long-Term Outcomes After Critical Care Discharge: A Prospective Cohort Study. Chest. 2021; 160(5):1681-1692. PMC: 9199363. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.069. View

17.

Lone N, Gillies M, Haddow C, Dobbie R, Rowan K, Wild S . Five-Year Mortality and Hospital Costs Associated with Surviving Intensive Care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 194(2):198-208. PMC: 5003217. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201511-2234OC. View

18.

Agard A, Egerod I, Tonnesen E, Lomborg K . From spouse to caregiver and back: a grounded theory study of post-intensive care unit spousal caregiving. J Adv Nurs. 2015; 71(8):1892-903. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12657. View

19.

Prinjha S, Field K, Rowan K . What patients think about ICU follow-up services: a qualitative study. Crit Care. 2009; 13(2):R46. PMC: 2689490. DOI: 10.1186/cc7769. View

20.

Jones J, Karahalios A, Puthucheary Z, Berry M, Files D, Griffith D . Responsiveness of Critically Ill Adults With Multimorbidity to Rehabilitation Interventions: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis Using Individual Pooled Data From Four Randomized Trials. Crit Care Med. 2023; 51(10):1373-1385. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005936. View