» Articles » PMID: 38741179

Is the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) E-guide an Acceptable and Feasible Tool for Increasing Gastroenterologists' Guideline Adherence? A Mixed Methods Evaluation

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 May 14
PMID 38741179
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Management of inflammatory bowel disease is constantly evolving, increasing the importance for gastroenterologists to keep up to date with guidelines. Traditional implementation strategies have had only small positive impacts on clinical practice. eHealth strategies such as the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation e-guide may be beneficial for clinician decision making in keeping with guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the e-guide.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability. Cognitive (think-aloud) interviews were conducted with Australian gastroenterologists while using the e-guide. Two clinical scenarios were developed to allow evaluation of various aspects of the e-guide. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative interview data and descriptive analysis to the quantitative and observational data.

Results: Seventeen participants completed the study. Data saturation were reached. The ECCO e-guide was largely feasible and acceptable, as demonstrated by most clinical questions answered correctly, 87% reaching the answer within 3 min, and most feeling it was useful, would be beneficial to their practice and would use it again. Issues raised included difficulties with website navigation, layout of the e-guide and difficulties with access (network firewalls, paid subscription required).

Conclusions: The ECCO e-guide is largely acceptable and feasible for gastroenterologists to use. Aspects of the e-guide could be modified to improve user experience. This study highlights the importance of engaging end-users in the development and evaluation of clinician educational tools.

References
1.
Kreps G . Evaluating health communication programs to enhance health care and health promotion. J Health Commun. 2014; 19(12):1449-59. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2014.954080. View

2.
Forsetlund L, OBrien M, Forsen L, Reinar L, Okwen M, Horsley T . Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 9:CD003030. PMC: 8441047. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub3. View

3.
Pugatch J, Grenen E, Surla S, Schwarz M, Cole-Lewis H . Information Architecture of Web-Based Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(3):e97. PMC: 5978245. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7867. View

4.
Bright T, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux R . Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(1):29-43. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450. View

5.
Neuhauser L, Kreps G . Integrating design science theory and methods to improve the development and evaluation of health communication programs. J Health Commun. 2014; 19(12):1460-71. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2014.954081. View