» Articles » PMID: 38737558

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Second Trimester As a Complement to Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Fetal Anomalies

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 May 13
PMID 38737558
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Fetal ultrasound has limitations, especially if the patient is obese or in cases with oligohydramnios. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can then be used as a complement, but only few studies have focused on examinations in the second trimester.

Purpose: To validate MRI as a complement to diagnose fetal anomalies in the second trimester.

Material And Methods: This retrospective study retrieved data from January 2008 to July 2012 from the Fetal Medicine Unit and Department of Radiology at Uppsala University Hospital. Ultrasound and MRI findings were reviewed in 121 fetuses in relation to the final diagnosis, including postpartum follow-up and autopsy results.

Results: Of the 121 fetuses, 51 (42%) had a CNS anomaly and 70 (58%) a non-CNS anomaly diagnosed or suspected. MRI provided additional information in 21% of all cases without changing the management and revealed information that changed the management of the pregnancy in 13%. When a CNS anomaly was detected or suspected, the MRI provided additional information in 22% and changed the management in 10%. The corresponding figures for non-CNS cases were 21% and 16%, respectively. The proportion of cases with additional information that changed the management was especially high in patients with a BMI >30 kg/m (25%) and in patients with oligohydramnios (38%). In five cases in category III, false-positive ultrasound findings were identified.

Conclusions: MRI in the second trimester complements ultrasound and improves diagnosis of fetal CNS- and non-CNS anomalies especially when oligohydramnios or maternal obesity is present.

References
1.
Pugash D, Brugger P, Bettelheim D, Prayer D . Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 68(2):214-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.031. View

2.
Style C, Mehollin-Ray A, Verla M, Lau P, Cruz S, Espinoza J . Timing of Prenatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019; 47(3):205-213. DOI: 10.1159/000501556. View

3.
Fadda G, Capobianco G, Balata A, Litta P, Ambrosini G, DAntona D . Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42,256 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 144(2):110-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.045. View

4.
Millischer A, Sonigo P, Ville Y, Brunelle F, Boddaert N, Salomon L . Standardized fetal anatomical examination using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42(5):553-9. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12415. View

5.
Griffiths P, Bradburn M, Campbell M, Cooper C, Graham R, Jarvis D . Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2016; 389(10068):538-546. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8. View