» Articles » PMID: 38737161

Accuracy and Utility of Internet Image Search As a Learning Tool for Retinal Pathology

Overview
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 May 13
PMID 38737161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Ophthalmology residency training heavily relies on visual and pattern recognition-based learning. In parallel with traditional reference texts, online internet search via Google Image Search (GIS) is commonly used and offers an accessible fund of reference images for ophthalmology trainees seeking rapid exposure to images of retinal pathology. However, the accuracy and quality of this tool within this context is unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy and quality of GIS images of selected retinal pathologies.  A cross-sectional study was performed of GIS of 15 common and 15 rare retinal diseases drawn from the American Academy of Ophthalmology residency textbook series. A total of 300 evaluable image results were assessed for accuracy of images and image source accountability in consultation with a vitreoretinal surgeon.  A total of 377 images were reviewed with 77 excluded prior to final analysis. A total of 288 (96%) search results accurately portrayed the retinal disease being searched, whereas 12 (4%) were of an erroneous diagnosis. More images of common retinal diseases were from patient education Web sites than were images of rare diseases (  < 0.01). Significantly more images of rare retinal diseases were found in peer-reviewed sources (  = 0.01).  GIS search results yielded a modest level of accuracy for the purposes of ophthalmic education. Despite the ease and rapidity of accessing multimodal retinal imaging examples, this tool may best be suited as a supplementary resource for learning among residents due to limited accuracy, lack of sufficient supporting information, and the source Web site's focus on patient education.

References
1.
Yacob M, Lotfi S, Tang S, Jetty P . Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2020; 6(1):e18076. PMC: 7334757. DOI: 10.2196/18076. View

2.
Derakhshan A, Lee L, Bhama P, Barbarite E, Shaye D . Assessing the educational quality of 'YouTube' videos for facelifts. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019; 40(2):156-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.01.001. View

3.
Azer S . Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 26(2):155-63. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000003. View

4.
Smith D . Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228786. PMC: 7028268. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228786. View

5.
Freeman R, Ashouri F, Papanikitas J, Ricketts D . Accuracy of internet images of glenoid labral injuries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013; 95(6):418-20. PMC: 4188290. DOI: 10.1308/003588413X13629960046958. View