» Articles » PMID: 38736888

Macrophages in Guided Bone Regeneration: Potential Roles and Future Directions

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2024 May 13
PMID 38736888
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is one of the most widely used and thoroughly documented alveolar bone augmentation surgeries. However, implanting GBR membranes inevitably triggers an immune response, which can lead to inflammation and failure of bone augmentation. It has been shown that GBR membranes may significantly improve outcomes as potent immunomodulators, rather than solely serving as traditional barriers. Macrophages play crucial roles in immune responses and participate in the entire process of bone injury repair. The significant diversity and high plasticity of macrophages complicate our understanding of the immunomodulatory mechanisms underlying GBR. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent findings on the potential role of macrophages in GBR for bone defects in situ. Specifically, macrophages can promote osteogenesis or fibrous tissue formation in bone defects and degradation or fibrous encapsulation of membranes. Moreover, GBR membranes can influence the recruitment and polarization of macrophages. Therefore, immunomodulating GBR membranes are primarily developed by improving macrophage recruitment and aggregation as well as regulating macrophage polarization. However, certain challenges remain to be addressed in the future. For example, developing more rational and sophisticated sequential delivery systems for macrophage activation reagents; addressing the interference of bone graft materials and dental implants; and understanding the correlations among membrane degradation, macrophage responses, and bone regeneration.

Citing Articles

Synthetic Nanopillars for Stimulating Osteoblast Activity and Osteointegration in Bone-Related Disorders.

Liang W, Zhou C, Liu X, Xie Q, Xia L, Li Q Int J Nanomedicine. 2025; 20:2205-2223.

PMID: 39990287 PMC: 11847438. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S501963.


Mobilization of subcutaneous fascia contributes to the vascularization and function of acellular adipose matrix via formation of vascular matrix complex.

Yang H, Xu Y, Cheong S, Xie C, Zhu Y, Xu S Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30:101461.

PMID: 39866780 PMC: 11764388. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101461.


Bioceramic Surface Topography Regulating Immune Osteogenesis.

Hao J, Du L, He Y, Wu C BME Front. 2025; 6():0089.

PMID: 39850150 PMC: 11756600. DOI: 10.34133/bmef.0089.

References
1.
Majumder N, Roy S, Sharma A, Arora S, Vaishya R, Bandyopadhyay A . Assessing the advantages of 3D bioprinting and 3D spheroids in deciphering the osteoarthritis healing mechanism using human chondrocytes and polarized macrophages. Biomed Mater. 2024; 19(2). DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad1d18. View

2.
Srivastava A, Makarenkova H . Innate Immunity and Biological Therapies for the Treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(23). PMC: 7730146. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239172. View

3.
Garg K, Pullen N, Oskeritzian C, Ryan J, Bowlin G . Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2013; 34(18):4439-51. PMC: 3623371. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.065. View

4.
Retzepi M, Donos N . Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(6):567-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x. View

5.
Vishwakarma A, Bhise N, Evangelista M, Rouwkema J, Dokmeci M, Ghaemmaghami A . Engineering Immunomodulatory Biomaterials To Tune the Inflammatory Response. Trends Biotechnol. 2016; 34(6):470-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009. View