Evaluation of an Optimized Workflow for the Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Overview

Journal Med Sci Monit

Specialties General Medicine
Pathology

Date 2024 May 12

PMID 38734884

Authors

Luqian Cui

Shihua Cui

Jingchao Li

Haijia Yu

Huihui Song

Yingjie Chu

Shujuan Dong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND A significant number of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences occur after initial ablation, often due to pulmonary vein reconnections or triggers from non-pulmonary veins. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for the first time were enrolled. Base on propensity score matching (1: 1 matching), 118 patients were selected for an optimized workflow for the radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF (OWCA) group and a conventional group. Comparative analysis of the acute and 12-month clinical outcomes was conducted. Moreover, an artificial intelligence analytics platform was used to evaluate the quality of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) circles. RESULTS PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. Incidence of first-pass isolation of bilateral PVI circles was higher (P=0.009) and acute pulmonary vein reconnections was lower (P=0.027) in the OWCA group than conventional group. The OWCA group displayed a significant reduction in the number of fractured points (P<0.001), stacked points (P=0.003), and a greater proportion of cases in which the radiofrequency index achieved the target value (P=0.003). Additionally, the contact force consistently met the force over time criteria (P<0.001) for bilateral PVI circles in the OWCA group, accompanied by a shorter operation time (P=0.017). During the 12-month follow-up period, the OWCA group exhibited a higher atrial arrhythmia-free survival rate following the initial ablation procedure than did the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS The optimized workflow for radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF could play a crucial role in creating higher quality PVI circles. This improvement is reflected in a significantly elevated 12-month atrial arrhythmia-free survival rate.

References

Takigawa M, Takahashi A, Kuwahara T, Okubo K, Takahashi Y, Nakashima E . Impact of Non-Pulmonary Vein Foci on the Outcome of the Second Session of Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26(7):739-46. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12681. View

Di Biase L, Conti S, Mohanty P, Bai R, Sanchez J, Walton D . General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: results from a randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 8(3):368-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.043. View

Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Lim W, Wongwarawipat T, Hunter R, Dhillon G . Efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Europace. 2020; 22(11):1659-1671. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa224. View

Shah S, Barakat A, Saliba W, Rehman K, Tarakji K, Rickard J . Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Initial Long-Term Ablation Success: Electrophysiological Findings and Outcomes of Repeat Ablation Procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(4):e005785. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005785. View

Tzou W, Sauer W . Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: May the Force (and Stability) Be With You, Always. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 6(2):153-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.12.006. View

Pimentel R, Rahai N, Maccioni S, Khanna R . Differences in outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with versus without intracardiac echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33(9):2015-2047. PMC: 9544828. DOI: 10.1111/jce.15599. View

Hayashi K, Okumura K, Okamatsu H, Kaneko S, Negishi K, Tsurugi T . Real-time visualization of the esophagus and left atrial posterior wall by intra-left atrial echocardiography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021; 63(3):629-637. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-021-01093-w. View

Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C . 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the.... Eur Heart J. 2020; 42(5):373-498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. View

Marijon E, Fazaa S, Narayanan K, Guy-Moyat B, Bouzeman A, Providencia R . Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25(2):130-7. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12303. View

10.

Ouyang F, Tilz R, Chun J, Schmidt B, Wissner E, Zerm T . Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-up. Circulation. 2010; 122(23):2368-77. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.946806. View

11.

Sairaku A, Nakano Y, Oda N, Makita Y, Kajihara K, Tokuyama T . Learning curve for ablation of atrial fibrillation in medium-volume centers. J Cardiol. 2011; 57(3):263-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2011.01.005. View

12.

Fitzpatrick N, Mittal A, Galvin J, Jauvert G, Keaney J, Keelan E . The impact of steerable sheath visualization during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2023; 25(4):1345-1351. PMC: 10105886. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad029. View

13.

Afzal M, Chatta J, Samanta A, Waheed S, Mahmoudi M, Vukas R . Use of contact force sensing technology during radiofrequency ablation reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12(9):1990-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.026. View

14.

Ejima K, Kato K, Iwanami Y, Henmi R, Yagishita D, Manaka T . Impact of an Empiric Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation on the Outcome of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116(11):1711-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.005. View

15.

Packer D, Mark D, Robb R, Monahan K, Bahnson T, Poole J . Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019; 321(13):1261-1274. PMC: 6450284. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.0693. View

16.

Garcia R, Waldmann V, Vanduynhoven P, Nesti M, de Oliveira Figueiredo M, Narayanan K . Worldwide sedation strategies for atrial fibrillation ablation: current status and evolution over the last decade. Europace. 2021; 23(12):2039-2045. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab154. View

17.

Piorkowski C, Eitel C, Rolf S, Bode K, Sommer P, Gaspar T . Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective, randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(2):157-65. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957761. View

18.

El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, Wolf M, Demolder A, Choudhury R . Determinants of Acute and Late Pulmonary Vein Reconnection in Contact Force-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Identifying the Weakest Link in the Ablation Chain. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10(4). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004867. View

19.

Rajendra A, Hunter T, Morales G, Zei P, Boo L, Varley A . Steerable sheath visualizable under 3D electroanatomical mapping facilitates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with minimal fluoroscopy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022; 66(2):381-388. PMC: 9977702. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01332-8. View

20.

Khalaph M, Sommer P, Lucas P, Guckel D, Fink T, Sciacca V . First clinical experience using a visualized sheath for atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022; 45(8):922-929. DOI: 10.1111/pace.14555. View